Sounds good.

Once again, idle FOR.

I’d prefer something a bit more predictable, rather than forcing players to second-guess the whims of the Executor - even if it was just one of a few basic event types (“A specific Guest dies unless a Crisis is enacted to save them! Or a specific Room becomes out-of-bounds for 24 hours! Or the lights go out!”) which I would select with a die roll and then put some narrative spin on.

I wouldn’t want to foil someone’s ingenious long-term strategy by pulling a weird gamestate change out of the air.

Seeing as the Executor himself dislikes this, meaning that he will be unhappy using the powers it grants him, passing it seems a little pointless.

CoV per Kevan.

Per Kevan

@Anonyman: Please make a post announcing your arrival.

I wouldn’t refuse to invoke this rule if most people wanted the game to work this way, I’m just commenting that games allow for more interesting strategies if the players have a clear idea of what can and can’t suddenly happen. (I’d still include a lot of will-roll-to-see-who-this-affects randomness in any event I announced, though.)

per Kev and [the quite Anonymous] Anonyman.

defer to kevan.

Revoting to celebrate my new existence: