Friday, November 04, 2011

Proposal: Counteract representation inflation!

Self-Killed by southpointchariot. DBCS ON BEHALF OF ais523. ~~Chronos Phaenon

Adminned at 05 Nov 2011 05:31:26 UTC

REPRESENTING: Amnistar, Bucky, Chronos Phaenon, coppro, southpointingchariot, flurie

Append the following paragraph to the rule “Involuntary Representation Service”:

As a weekly action, a Player can spend 2 SP to cause the author of a specified Pending Representation Proposal to lose a number of SP equal to half the number of Players in its Representation List, rounded down, or all their SP if they don’t have that much SP.

or if more than half the EVCs on this proposal contain “Make it harsher”, instead append:

As a weekly action, a Player can spend 3 SP to cause the author of a specified Pending Representation Proposal to lose a number of SP equal to the number of Players in its Representation List, or all their SP if they don’t have that much SP.

Limiting the length of Representation Lists to SP doesn’t really help avoid the repeated creation of long Representation Lists we’re seeing, because rich players will still be able to Represent all the players they want. Better that there’s some penalty to making large representation lists willy-nilly, although not a guaranteed one, depending on whether other players are willing to spend SP to punish them.

Comments

Murphy:

04-11-2011 19:46:21 UTC

for

ais523:

04-11-2011 19:50:04 UTC

EAV for (I personally prefer the less harsh version; flurie suggested the harsher one because he thought the mechanic might be a bit weak otherwise.)

ChronosPhaenon:

04-11-2011 20:10:54 UTC

for

flurie:

04-11-2011 20:19:03 UTC

for Make it harsher

Spitemaster:

04-11-2011 20:24:53 UTC

for

scshunt:

04-11-2011 20:37:12 UTC

for

southpointingchariot:

04-11-2011 21:09:30 UTC

but… my moneys…  against

southpointingchariot:

04-11-2011 21:10:15 UTC

damnit damnit damnit accident.

ais523:

04-11-2011 21:14:47 UTC

OK, so perhaps large representation lists are balanced by a higher risk of people s/king the proposal by mistake. Should I repropose it?

omd:

04-11-2011 21:24:37 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

05-11-2011 03:28:34 UTC

against

Bucky:

05-11-2011 04:07:47 UTC

against per southpointingchariot