Call for Judgment: Final solution
Nought-Eleven. —Excalabur
Adminned at 28 Feb 2006 03:32:30 UTC
Idle Captain/Bucky. He may not request to be unidled.
Nought-Eleven. —Excalabur
Adminned at 28 Feb 2006 03:32:30 UTC
Idle Captain/Bucky. He may not request to be unidled.
Arrrr, I’d make whoever wrote this walk the plank, if that’s okay with me crew.
You are aware of course that we have the IP addresses of all posters, yes? I know that it may be tempting to be somewhat trollish when anonymity prevents you from knowing any of the other players, but think a little before posting this a third time, yes?
Well, as far as I read it, you haven’t done anything really trollish yet. On the other hand, reproposing something that failed unanimously with the exact same obnoxious headline is somewhat crass. =)
So when I anonymously repeal all the laws and rules as per Venting loophole, I’d better do it from a borrowed computer?
According to the ruleset, no. According to AG, yes.
According to me, I don’t know. Ask someone else.
Well, Bucky, your IP address would still be geographically close to your standard account, although if you live in a larger city with several other players, you’re probably safe.
Banja: Yeah, there are logs in the shell account.
Incidentally, enacting (or otherwise editing) posts changes their owner, so I can’t determine who posted the first CfJ. As this one has yet to be edited, however..
Oh… I may have accidentally edited this in an effort to find out the author. I feel shameful.
Well, you didn’t change authorship. Feeling jumpy? =D
As it is, I’m sure than whomever made the posts must feel suitable chagrined and won’t do such things again. I’m sure we can move along.
Not yet at quorum.
Troll.
I wonder how we can prevent egregious trolling.
And the IPs are written in the shell? Really?
90000:
What makes this different from the last one except the pronoun?