Thursday, June 14, 2012

This certainly was not an unintended consequence

Per http://blognomic.com/wiki/index.php?title=Ruleset_60

the Narrator shall multiply the Relationship of each Active Character by their PP and add the results. If this sum is less than or equal to 0, the Protagonist dies and a new metadynasty begins

In doing so, the Protagonist has indeed died and therefor, a meta has started.

and this is a time buddha action, in case anyone asks

Comments

Kevan: he/him

14-06-2012 07:15:39 UTC

For detail’s sake, note that “metadynasty” is not defined by any rule (it was a core rule in Ruleset 60, but was later dropped), and Dynasty 100 has not explicitly ended.

Purplebeard:

14-06-2012 08:09:33 UTC

I thought the same, but apparently we’ve reinstated the rule. Rule 1.3: “If there is no Time Buddha, the Dynasty is a Metadynasty.”

By implication, Darknight is now no longer the Time Buddha.

Kevan: he/him

14-06-2012 10:33:30 UTC

Oh, fair enough. But I think all we can take from that is that a Metadynasty is a type of Dynasty (so, fair enough, a “new dynasty” has begun).

I don’t think the lack of a Time Buddha goes both ways, though - it’s not saying “a Metadynasty is a Dynasty with no Time Buddha”, it’s just describing one legal way by which a Dynasty becomes known as a Metadynasty. Ruleset 60 gave us another, unrelated way.

ais523:

14-06-2012 11:12:37 UTC

I’m not entirely convinced that that leaves it defined as to who the Time Buddha is, if anyone. (Does it default to previous-value, or undefined?)

I guess we have to fall back on the ordinary-language definition of “metadynasty”, which is, umm, anyone know? A quick search implies that the term is primarily used in the context of BlogNomic, so I guess the ordinary English meaning is “a BlogNomic dynasty with no Emperor”. (The other uses seem to be in what I can only assume is fanfiction, where the meaning seems to approximate “a dynasty-like structure formed out of dynasties rather than out of individual reins.” Not sure what starting a new one of those would mean in the context of BlogNomic.)

Josh: he/they

14-06-2012 11:21:19 UTC

I think we just experienced it, ais.