After “Tightening the Ruleset,” don’t the people in faction-within-factions need to revert to singular factions?
And furthermore, don’t the people not in Blo need to have “-” fractures? I certainly doubt the legitimacy of Clucky’s 32773 figure in any case.
Even accepting this, one only has 206 bones to break. And I also wonder how Darth Cliche got 184 fractures.
1. Will people stop talking about “206 bones”? That’s not in the GNO ruleset.
2. I got those through a loophole created by monkey-smashing.
I don’t understand how you and Clucky got them in the first place, is all. I can see how the monkey-smash thing could have happened, although I wouldn’t suggest you ever going to Blo due to paraplegia. On the other hand, I don’t get Clucky’s number at all.
There’s nothing that says you can’t have more fractures than you have bones.
No, but fractures are defined as the number of bones broken. That number, by necessity (and spelled out pretty clearly) must be 206 or below. Also, I doubt Clucky did anything 327773 times.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Klisz:
Good point.