Monday, August 24, 2009

Call for Judgment: No more.

Passes 6-3. - Qwazukee

Adminned at 28 Aug 2009 19:53:14 UTC

Append the following sentence to rule 1.3 “Proposals”:

A Proposal may not also be a Call for Judgment

posted by Ienpw III at 24 Aug 2009 06:35:01 UTC Comments (29)

Comments

Ienpw III:

08-24-2009 06:40:30 UTC

Author for

Darknight:

08-24-2009 06:46:18 UTC

for

Rodlen:

08-24-2009 08:35:36 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

08-24-2009 11:55:46 UTC

for

Kevan:

08-24-2009 13:10:36 UTC

Wouldn’t “posts may not be made in more than one category” cover more bases here?

Qwazukee:

08-24-2009 13:24:41 UTC

Perhaps, just so those CfJs can’t also be Story Posts or something. We can pass this and then Propose that, if we want.

Ienpw III:

08-24-2009 14:41:33 UTC

Well, I was just thinking that certain theme ideas might allow Story/proposals

Klisz:

08-24-2009 16:46:37 UTC

against  I don’t see why they shouldn’t be allowed.

Pavitra:

08-24-2009 17:27:37 UTC

for and endorse Kevan/Qwazukee.

Klisz:

08-24-2009 18:20:39 UTC

Pavitra: BN has no endorsement.

Bucky:

08-24-2009 20:55:29 UTC

for

Bucky:

08-24-2009 20:56:00 UTC

Actually, CoV against as per my standard policy on legislative CfJs.

Qwazukee:

08-24-2009 20:59:30 UTC

What about legislative CfJ/Proposals?  : p

Excalabur:

08-24-2009 22:36:57 UTC

for Though I would’ve been happier retconning their nonexistence.

Bucky:

08-25-2009 07:12:22 UTC

@Qwaz: I object to using CfJs to handle stuff that should be dealt with by proposal.

Klisz:

08-25-2009 13:57:49 UTC

CoV for  To speed this up.

Qwazukee:

08-25-2009 14:21:43 UTC

Passing 7-1.

Wakukee:

08-25-2009 20:34:21 UTC

for

Klisz:

08-26-2009 01:57:11 UTC

8-1. If Bucky CoVs this passes.

spikebrennan:

08-26-2009 21:24:02 UTC

against
Strictly speaking, this is a ruleset change which should be effected by proposal and not by CfJ.

Klisz:

08-26-2009 22:27:14 UTC

Since yuri idled, I think this is now illegal.

Qwazukee:

08-26-2009 23:43:06 UTC

yuri Idling does not make this illegal, it just means that his vote no longer counts. It’s now at 7-2.

Klisz:

08-27-2009 04:20:50 UTC

6-2, actually, since Pavitra idled.

Qwazukee:

08-27-2009 04:24:46 UTC

Ah, this was before then.

CoV against because this is gonna time out.

5-3.

Ienpw III:

08-27-2009 18:10:51 UTC

7-3, as I’m back.

Ienpw III:

08-27-2009 18:11:26 UTC

make that 6-3

Qwazukee:

08-27-2009 18:26:16 UTC

Actually, via Rule 1.4, you need to revote for it to count, yuri.

Ienpw III:

08-27-2009 22:27:28 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

08-27-2009 22:39:52 UTC

Now 6-3.

Uh, did anyone else notice that the Sidebar duplicated the part that says, “Pending Calls for Judgment?”