Monday, October 04, 2010

Proposal: Reconnecting

Passes 9-1. —Brendan

Adminned at 04 Oct 2010 22:20:21 UTC

If the Proposal “Making a connection.” fails, this Proposal does nothing.

Reword the rule entitled “Contacts” to the following:

An Agent may, if they have not yet done so when they had their current Location, telephone D-Ops requesting a contact. D-Ops should respond to this email.  Responses by D-Ops shall be determined in the following manner:

  • If the Agent requesting a contact has a Location of “Unknown,” D-Ops will refuse and cite this reason.
  • Otherwise, if there exists at least one other Agent or Imposter with the same Allegiance and Location as the Agent requesting the contact, D-Ops will respond with one of their Codenames.
  • If neither of the above are true, D-Ops will respond that there are no contacts available.

If D-Ops does give the requesting Agent a contact, D-Ops will also inform the contact that they have been so assigned, and send them the Codename of the requesting Agent.

Comments

Klisz:

10-04-2010 17:16:01 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

10-04-2010 17:33:33 UTC

imperial

Blacky:

10-04-2010 18:51:43 UTC

imperial

Kevan:

10-04-2010 19:20:34 UTC

for

Thane Q:

10-04-2010 19:34:09 UTC

against I still would like a chance of misinformation and receiving a false positive of an enemy-allied agent’s codename being forwarded.

lilomar:

10-04-2010 19:35:35 UTC

imperial

Ienpw III:

10-04-2010 19:52:48 UTC

imperial

Darknight:

10-04-2010 21:24:42 UTC

for

Roujo:

10-05-2010 02:02:36 UTC

imperial