Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Proposal: Confrontation

Passes with 11 :for: and 2 :against: (Timed out)—Wakukee

Adminned at 22 May 2009 14:15:40 UTC

Add a new dynastic rule entitled Confrontation:

If two Contestants have their Vote set to each other, they are Rivals. If both of the Rivals are Leaders, then one of the Rivals may create a Story Post stating that he/she is challenging their Rival to a Confrontation. Within 72 hours of the Confrontation being announced, both Rivals must roll DICEX where X is equal to the number of Followers the Rival has. Whichever Rival rolls the higher number is declared the Fight Victor; the Rival with the lower number is the Fight Loser. If one of the Rivals does not roll a DICEX within 72 hours, that Rival is a No-Show.

If one Rival is a No-Show, they are declared the Fight Loser, and the other Rival is declared the Fight Winner. If both Rivals are No-Shows, each lowers their fame by 1.

The Fight Victor gains 4 Fame. The Fight Loser gains 2 Fame and then becomes an Outsider, unless they are a No-Show, in which case they lose 1 Fame and then become an Outsider.

 

Comments

Influenza:

05-20-2009 21:23:08 UTC

for

Yoda:

05-20-2009 21:44:38 UTC

for

ais523:

05-20-2009 21:45:15 UTC

for Although that’s a verbal argument-type fight with maybe a bit of pushing and shoving, not a boxing match, right?

Klisz:

05-20-2009 21:45:36 UTC

for

Ienpw III:

05-20-2009 21:51:02 UTC

Correct. Although… maybe someone can add onto this later…

ais523:

05-20-2009 21:51:08 UTC

against Wait, no, I like the idea but there’s a loophole here. Please put a limit on how often this sort of thing can happen; or a cabal of four players could get infinite Fame between them. (I wonder if that was deliberate or not…)

Qwazukee:

05-20-2009 22:12:59 UTC

for Someone propose a fix, I like this idea.

Darknight:

05-20-2009 22:21:58 UTC

for

Ienpw III:

05-20-2009 23:09:55 UTC

I proposed a fix

arthexis:

05-21-2009 01:16:07 UTC

for

delta:

05-21-2009 08:53:11 UTC

against

Bucky:

05-21-2009 16:55:14 UTC

for

ais523:

05-21-2009 17:39:27 UTC

for now we have a fix proposal

smith:

05-22-2009 00:00:53 UTC

against

SingularByte:

05-22-2009 08:46:20 UTC

for