Proposal: Editors, Mark III
Failed 9-5—Rodlen
Adminned at 20 Mar 2009 01:30:17 UTC
Create a new rule, called “Editor Cuts”, with the following text:
At the time of posting of each new Act, the player or players with the highest positive Popularity are made Editors for that Act. The Drawing Board shall include a list of that Act’s Editors. An Editor may Cut one Scene from the Act for which he or she is Editor.
Deserves to happen, but giving it to admins is possibly a bad idea.

Comments
Gnauga:
Klisz:
Qwazukee:
Sure.
Darknight:
arthexis:
Rodlen:
Altharis:
Not because I don’t like the idea, but I think they should be a price for using that ability. Bodies wouldn’t work. Editors are universally unpopular, so maybe 1 popularity would be worth it.
Plus, using this ability means that the targeted player loses their turns body count. No unsignificant loss.
SingularByte:
What stops an editor from waiting until someone has almost won the popularity vote then cutting it? That way, nobody could get any popularity. Alternatively, they could cut their own scene to avoid losing popularity.
Kevan:
ais523:
allispaul:
Sure, it could be gamed easily, but in my opinion, we need a little game right now. All these loopholes could easily be fixed, anyway. That, or made an important part of players’ strategy.
Influenza:
Devenger:
Additionally, Popularity does not have enough variance, which could cause some ridiculous cases of many Editors, each of which can cut one scene!
Finally, I’d rather not alienate some players if this editing thing gets political, which it may do. Especially because there’s nothing saying you can’t Cut Scenes from Finished Acts, which is craaazy.
Enough reasons?
Qwazukee:
CoV
Devenger is very thorough.
Jeid: