Proposal: Tenure
Can’t enacted with five votes against. Failed 1-5 by Kevan.
Adminned at 02 Oct 2012 10:33:40 UTC
If the proposal “Incentives” failed, then add the following paragraph to the rule “Teacher Training”:-
If this list of conditions contains five or more items and at least 60% of them are struck through, then Proposals may not be vetoed and all votes of DEFERENTIAL are ignored. This takes precedence over the Core Rules.
This proposal is a correction, with the Incentives proposal as its citation.
Josh’s suggestion of having a sufficient number of poor behaviours end the game and undo all gameplay to that point would, I feel, be an error. I suggest we simply revoke the Professor’s veto and deferential powers. And on a lesser note, although a 60% cut-off point is reasonable, it’s only two out of three at the moment; I think we should encourage some further conditions before we start using it.
Comments
Josh:
Kevan:
He can’t do much to “block” a proposal. Going as far as vetoing popular suggestions would almost certainly burn up enough goodwill for players to just CfJ an end to the dynasty.
Clucky:
quirck:
IceFromHell:
Bucky: