Monday, October 01, 2012

Proposal: Tenure

Can’t enacted with five votes against. Failed 1-5 by Kevan.

Adminned at 02 Oct 2012 03:33:40 UTC

If the proposal “Incentives” failed, then add the following paragraph to the rule “Teacher Training”:-

If this list of conditions contains five or more items and at least 60% of them are struck through, then Proposals may not be vetoed and all votes of DEFERENTIAL are ignored. This takes precedence over the Core Rules.

This proposal is a correction, with the Incentives proposal as its citation.

Josh’s suggestion of having a sufficient number of poor behaviours end the game and undo all gameplay to that point would, I feel, be an error. I suggest we simply revoke the Professor’s veto and deferential powers. And on a lesser note, although a 60% cut-off point is reasonable, it’s only two out of three at the moment; I think we should encourage some further conditions before we start using it.


Josh: Observer he/they

01-10-2012 11:54:57 UTC

against Not keen on “If this list of conditions contains five or more items” - I think that incentivises the Professor to block proposals that add new conditions.

Kevan: he/him

01-10-2012 12:54:49 UTC

He can’t do much to “block” a proposal. Going as far as vetoing popular suggestions would almost certainly burn up enough goodwill for players to just CfJ an end to the dynasty.

Clucky: he/him

01-10-2012 19:17:49 UTC

against dislike losing the veto. If it gets abused, we should do something about it, but not as part of standard game procedure

quirck: he/him

01-10-2012 20:30:40 UTC

imperial  against


01-10-2012 22:59:14 UTC



02-10-2012 02:01:43 UTC