Sunday, December 13, 2009

Proposal: Admin Option 2

13-1, cannot be enacted w/o CoV -Darth

Adminned at 13 Dec 2009 21:16:08 UTC

In Rule 1.5 Enactment, immediately following:

Whenever an Admin marks a proposal, CfJ, or DoV as passed or failed, he must also mark his name, and report the final tally of votes (or the fact that it was self-killed or vetoed).

add:

When reporting the final tally of votes, the admin should report whichever type of counted vote had the greatest number, followed by the type which had the least number, followed by the number of unresolved DEFERENTIAL votes, if any.

Other way which is uniform.

Comments

Ornithopter:

12-13-2009 18:37:03 UTC

imperial
Let’s hope they don’t both pass.

Hix:

12-13-2009 18:40:29 UTC

against Doesn’t take into account the possibility that the previous Proposal will pass.

Also, it ain’t broke.  So don’t fix it.

Josh:

12-13-2009 18:48:16 UTC

against per Hix.

Falkuon:

12-13-2009 19:00:44 UTC

against

Kevan:

12-13-2009 19:01:11 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

12-13-2009 19:01:42 UTC

I was reasonably certain that neither of them would pass. But I thought I ought to put it out there since I brought it up.

SingularByte:

12-13-2009 19:20:40 UTC

against

Klisz:

12-13-2009 19:22:21 UTC

against

Ienpw III:

12-13-2009 19:31:17 UTC

against

Bucky:

12-13-2009 19:34:57 UTC

against

tecslicer:

12-13-2009 20:33:37 UTC

against

Wakukee:

12-13-2009 20:40:29 UTC

against

Darknight:

12-13-2009 22:25:18 UTC

against Admin stuff anyway ya want as long as we understand it. Ya two proposals feel like ya trying to force ya adminning style. And why now all of a sudden do ya want to bring this up?

Qwazukee:

12-14-2009 00:22:53 UTC

2 proposals actually give more options?

I’ve just been noticing that DC is adminning it differently than I had come to expect.

TrumanCapote:

12-14-2009 03:34:21 UTC

against