In terms of the former, I guess it becomes inert - just another contained artefact. The latter case doesn’t seem to have a use case defined right now.

“An Individual who has a choice in whether to take an action defined by a dynastic rule may not take that action if both of the following conditions are true: a) the action’s effects are limited to changing values tracked in gamestate-tracking entities (such as a wiki page), and b) the action would change one or more of those values to an illegal value.” would kick in and make the Containing action illegal. Would be better if we had a clause that covered it properly - I think Josh proposed something but it was rejected for tangential reasons.