Tuesday, July 01, 2025

Proposal: Repremanding Uninspired Shortcuts Taken

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed 1 vote to 7 (with 4 REVs) by Kevan.

Adminned at 03 Jul 2025 15:56:48 UTC

If there is a rule called “Proposalnym” then in it replace “As a Round Action, a Wordsmith who has posted a Proposalnym since the last time Acrogenerate was performed may claim 1 point.” with

A Wordsmith’s EVC on a Proposalnym should contain the word “Valid” if that Wordsmith believes the content of the proposal fits the title that was given to it.

When a Proposalnym is resolved, if a quorum of the EVCs made by Wordsmiths other than the Proposal’s author contain the word “Valid”, then the Proposal’s author gains 1 point; unless the author already gained a point from this method for the same Backronym in which case the author does not gain any points. 

The Puzzler is considered to be a Wordsmith for the purposes of this rule.

 

 

Idea is to prevent people from simply throwing up proposals with meaningless titles, instantly withdrawing them, and scoring points from that method.

Comments

Josh: he/they

01-07-2025 19:44:18 UTC

I think that the second paragraph is missing some words.

Bucky:

01-07-2025 20:17:46 UTC

against The escalation from one point per round to one point per proposal would make proposal titles more important than the actual Backronyms.

JonathanDark: Puzzler he/him

01-07-2025 20:20:51 UTC

Agreed, this should at least be a Round Action.  arrow

Clucky: he/him

01-07-2025 20:59:04 UTC

> unless the author already gained a point from this method for the same Backronym in which case the author does not gain any points.

Its already once per round

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

02-07-2025 00:03:09 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

02-07-2025 01:41:12 UTC

arrow

Clucky: he/him

02-07-2025 04:33:37 UTC

@darknight what are you looking for me to fix here?

Josh: he/they

02-07-2025 07:29:25 UTC

  against Worth fixing but a bit busywork-heavy for my tastes.

Kevan: he/him

02-07-2025 08:08:33 UTC

[Clucky] “for the same Backronym” would have to be “Acronym” to get a one-round limit.

arrow This could just be ”... so long as that Proposalnym includes at least a quorum of EVCs that include the word ‘Valid’” on the existing rule, so as not to push the claim work onto admins.

DoomedIdeas: he/him

02-07-2025 17:07:59 UTC

arrow