Sir, I don’t understand!
Was there a reason the last part of my last proposal (adding a sub-rule to 2.5 defining Class Actions) wasn’t enacted? If so, how should I phrase future sub-rule defining proposals to ensure they are added to the ruleset?
Was there a reason the last part of my last proposal (adding a sub-rule to 2.5 defining Class Actions) wasn’t enacted? If so, how should I phrase future sub-rule defining proposals to ensure they are added to the ruleset?
posted by William at 22 Nov 2010 06:49:32 UTC Comments (2)
Yes, that was just my mistake. Sorry, William. Thanks, Purplebeard.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
0.1556
Purplebeard:
The wording was fine, as far as I can tell. It was probably just a mistake on the enacting admin’s part. The proposed rule has been added now.