Sunday, April 28, 2024

Proposal: Stylish Play

In the Core rule “Dynasties” add a subrule named “Player Style” with the following text:

There is a gamestate variable named “Player Style” which defaults to empty and is automatically set to empty immediately after the end of an Interregnum. Player Style is only publicly tracked when it is not empty; otherwise it is implicitly privately tracked by the City. At any time when BlogNomic is not on Hiatus, Player Style may be set through the successful enactment of a Proposal.

When not empty, the contents of Player Style are nonbinding advisory statements on how Thieves expect each other to play the current dynasty. Thieves are encouraged to set the Player Style to statements that indicate the level of competitiveness, strictness of rule interpretation, and any other descriptive qualities that might affect how one Thief interprets the intentions of another Thief’s actions.

Thieves are encouraged to follow the general theme of the statements conatined in Player Style and to have public discussions when they feel that other Thieves are not meeting the expectations of those statements.

 

First attempt at a way to help prompt players to communicate their intentions.

Proposal: We skipped step 1

Add a new rule called “The Plan”

Each Thief has a Plan, which is privately tracked by the City and defaults to Standard. A Thief may change their plan at any time by privately messaging the City what they want their new plan to be

Each Plan has a name, which is flavor text used to reference and track the plan, and an effect. The possible plans are tracked in the table below


{| class="wikitable sortable"
! Name || Effect
|-
| Standard || The city add 1DICE3 to the haul during the Burglary
|-
| Pocket || You gain 1 Florin during the Burglary
|-
| Cash || If you have at least 2 Florins when the Burglary is run, lose 2 Florins and the city adds 2DICE5 to the haul during the Burglary
|-
| Stuff || If you have at least 3 Florins when the Burglary is run, lose 3 Florins and the city adds an additional Possession to the haul during the Burglary
|}

In “The Haul” replace “Add DICE20 Florins to the Haul” with “Add 1 Florin to the Haul” and “Make a blog post in the Story Post Votable Matter category announcing the contents of the Haul and what each Theif’s plan was; this is known as a Haul post”. Then add the step “Reset each Theif’s plan to Standard” as the final step of the Burglary.

Do you focus on yourself, get 1 for sure, help out the group and on average give +2 that might or might not come back to you, or go all out and actually put some skin in the game even though you still might be cut out in the end?

Proposal: No Speed Rounds

If there is no rule called “The Haul” this proposal has no effect

In “The Haul” replace “the City may perform the following atomic action, known as Burglary:-” with “and it has been at least 44 hours since this action was last performed, the City may perform the following atomic action, known as Burglary:-”

Currently a cabal could conceivably get Kevan to run a haul, all vote to give themselves the loot, and then Kevan runs another haul right away. Feel like ensuring a pace of about one haul every other day is better (44 hours is there to allow for time drift)

Proposal: Yet-To-Be-Prisoner’s Dilemma

Add the following to the end of “The Haul”:

A Haul post is Open if its status is not enacted.

Change “If the Haul is empty” to “If no Open Haul post exists”.

Create a subrule of “The Haul” named “Defectors” with the following body:

If there is an Open Haul post, a Thief may Defect at any time by sending a private message to the City (via Discord or the blog) announcing their intent to do so.

Thieves who have Defected may be referred to as Defectors.

Add the following step to the beginning of the Distribution action:

* If only one Thief has Defected since the creation of this Haul post, move the contents of the Haul to them and skip the next step;

Change the second step of that action to the following:

* Move the contents of the Haul to the Thieves in the manner specified by this common Proposition. If any elements would go to a Defector, instead keep them in the Haul;

Proposal: Unlimied

In the Appendix rule Spelling and Formatting, change “the Ruleset and their own Pending Votable Matters” to “the Ruleset, the Building Blocks page, and their own Pending Votable Matters”.

Proposal: Papoose

Add the following as a subrule of Possessions, called Containers:

Each Thief may have a number of Pouches.

A Pouch is a Possession that is used to contain Florins. Each individual Pouch is unique, and must have a name comprised of a combination of 5 symbols (from those found on this page) that has not been used as the name of another Pouch in this dynasty. The value of a Pouch is equal to the number of Florins used to create it and must be greater than 0; the value of each individual Pouch is privately tracked by the City. All Pouches have no effect.

As a daily action, a Thief may Sort their Pouches. Sorting Pouches is an atomic action with the following steps:
* Destroy all of their existing Pouches by removing them from their inventory, and gaining Florins equal to their value;
* Spend any number (greater than zero) of Florins, and create a new Pouch in their inventory with a valid name and a valid Value equal to the number of number of Florins so spent;
* Send a personal message to the City detailing the Pouches destroyed and created, with the new values of the latter.

Proposal: The Burlap Sack

Enact a new rule, “The Haul”:-

The Haul contains a list of Possessions and a number of Florins.

If the Haul is empty, the City may perform the following atomic action, known as Burglary:-

  • Add DICE20 Florins to the Haul
  • Select a random type of Possession and add one instance of it to the Haul
  • Make a blog post in the Story Post Votable Matter category announcing the contents of the Haul; this is known as a Haul post

Enact a subrule to “The Haul” called “Distribution”:-

A Thief may respond to a Haul post with a comment that includes a single suggested distribution of the contents of the Haul among one, some or all of the Thieves. Such responses must unambiguously identify where every element of the Haul’s contents would go. The most recent such response made by a Thief on a Haul post is known as their Proposition for that Haul.

If a quorum of Thieves have posted equivalent Propositions on a Haul post, the City may perform the atomic action of Distributing it:-
* Move the contents of the Haul to the Thieves in the manner specified by this common Proposition;
* Change the status of the Haul post to enacted.

Core game loop: a pile of loot is generated and the group have to agree (by at least a majority) on how to split it between them.

Loosely inspired by Tiefe Taschen and Junta but with (at least for now) a simpler and more blog-friendly resolution process of just waiting for any suggestion to hit quorum.

Proposal: Set a Thief

Enact a new rule, “The Thieves”:-

Each Thief has a number of Florins, and an inventory list of Possessions. These are publicly tracked.

Enact a new rule, “Possessions”:-

The following types of Possession exist, each with a Value and some having corresponding Effects:-

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Possession !! Value !! Effect
|-
| Lockpick || 1 || -
|-
| Candlestick || 3 || -
|-
| Gold Ring || 7 || -
|-
| Unappraised Gem || DICE10 || -
|}

At any time a Thief may remove a Possession from their own inventory to gain Florins equal to its Value.

Ascension Address: The Spoils

Cheap tallow candles in a high garret room. A few handfuls of small gold and silver coins are scattered across the wooden table, meagre spoils from a long night’s work through the city’s winding streets and unsecured doors. With lowered but insistent voices, a group are pushing the coins around the table, occasionally gesturing to marks and crosses on a map of the city, and dividing up their takings.

The group look up as the door bangs open, one of them instinctively snatching up and folding away the map, but it is only the last of their number returning.

The newcomer strides up to the table and throws a few more coins down, before holding a dark gemstone up against the candlelight. When the map holder gestures for this to also be added to the table, the new arrival holds out his other arm, the sleeve of which is ragged and bloody with the marks of a guard dog’s teeth. As the group tilt their heads and glance at each other, the holder of the stone closes his fist around it.

The term “Seeker” becomes “Thief” and “Observer” becomes “City”. The Public Tracking page becomes “The Garret”. The Building Block “Mantle Limiations” is activated.

My declared Imperial Style is Gardener/Protective/Powerhouse/Scam-Neutral/Guarded/Methodical.

Friday, April 26, 2024

The Darkroom

Post-dynastic washup thread.

Declaration of Victory: Photo Finish

Open for 12 hours with more than 2/3 of votes in favour including the Observer. Enacted 5-0 by Kevan.

Adminned at 26 Apr 2024 21:43:56 UTC

With 4 Awards I have achieved victory. My Private Criteria and their salts were, in chronological order:

“Satisfies the text of my 1st secret key. 512”, “Satisfies the text of my 2nd secret key. 104”, “Satisfies the text of my 3rd secret key. 826”, “Satisfies the text of my 4th secret key. 912”, “Satisfies the text of my 5th secret key. 783”, “Satisfies the text of my 2nd secret key. 953”, “Satisfies the text of my 5th secret key. 173”, “Satisfies the text of my 54th secret key. 511”, “Satisfies the text of my 29th secret key. 451”, “Satisfies the text of my 386th secret key. 613”, “Satisfies the text of my 853rd secret key. 271”, “Satisfies the text of my 3716th secret key. 523”, “Satisfies the text of my 3727th secret key. 124”, “Satisfies the text of my 1731st secret key. 436”, “Satisfies the text of my 7510th secret key. 415”, “Satisfies the text of my 9264th secret key. 774”, “Doesn’t contain a Mornington Crescent mug. 523”, “Doesn’t contain a Mornington Crescent mug. 124”, “Doesn’t contain a Mornington Crescent mug. 436”, “Doesn’t contain a Mornington Crescent mug. 415”, “Doesn’t contain a Mornington Crescent mug. 774”, “Doesn’t contain Bank tube station. 126”, “Doesn’t contain Euston tube station. 361”, “Doesn’t contain Morden tube station. 751”, “Doesn’t contain Chalk Farm tube station. 925”, “Doesn’t contain Balham tube station. 651”, “Contains a liftable manmade object. bkf”, “Neither the sky nor the sea is visible. wh6”, “Contains a painted surface (but not blue). dha”, “Contains something brown and/or striped. i8y”, “Camera is clearly angled downwards. kxj”, “Contains a tree, twig or playing card. g9q”, “Contains glass or clear plastic. ba8”, “Contains a crisp shadow or clear reflection. ba9”, “Contains an object at least 50m away. 6nj”, “Player name is neither horizontal nor red. 86h”

Award: Conceptual Balance

I claim the Conceptual Balance award: at this point on 22 April I had a Criteria at 4/4, from snaps 29 through 36.

Thursday, April 25, 2024

Guess: Kevan: Water

I think I will make an extraordinarily unlikely but somewhat topical guess:

Kevan is one of your criteria:

snap contains water?

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Proposal: Guessing Game 2.0

Timed out 2 votes to 2. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 28 Apr 2024 13:00:36 UTC

In the rule “Guesses” replace the text “Make a story post to the blog clearly declaring the name of the Targeted Seeker, and what the guesser thinks one of their Private Criteria are” with this text:

Make a story post to the blog containing each the following items: the name of the Targeted Seeker, text that uniquely identifies a single existing Authentic Shot posted within the last 48 hours where the Targeted Seeker has not yet responded to that post and the guesser is not the author of that post, and a number between 1 and 4 inclusive that the guesser thinks is the number of Private Criteria that the named Authentic Shot will satisfy for the Targeted Seeker.

In the same rule, replace the steps for the atomic action Resolving the Guess with the following steps:

* If the number mentioned in the guess is the same as the number of Private Criteria that is satisfied for the Targeted Seeker for that Authentic Shot, respond to the post with a for, reduce their own Score by the Exposure of each of the Private Criteria that is satisfied by that Authentic Shot, and increase the score of the Guesser by the same amount, and then remove each of that Private Criteria from the Target’s private criteria list (resetting its satisfying and unsatisfying counts to zero in the process)
* If the guess is not the same as the number of Private Criteria that is satisfied for the Targeted Seeker for that Authentic Shot, respond to the post with a against

Hopefully this will address the comments from the previous iteration of the Guessing Game proposal. Please do look for holes in this. Suggestions are welcome to word this more concisely if possible. That’s one thing I often struggle with.

Proposal: Conjunction Junction

Timed out 3 votes to 2. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 26 Apr 2024 09:20:28 UTC

In Criteria, replace “Private criteria may only refer to and be verified by the contents of the shot. Private criteria may not refer to things such as the date, other criteria, the contents of other documents or the thoughts, opinions or feelings of any Seeker.” with:

Private criteria may only refer to and be verified by the contents of the shot. Private criteria may not refer to things such as the date, other criteria, the contents of other documents or the thoughts, opinions or feelings of any Seeker. Private criteria may not use the conjunctions “and”, “or”, “and/or”, “nor” to combine multiple shot conditions.

This proposal disallows concatenated criteria.  For example: “Snap contains something black or stripped”.  Criteria with more than one condition make “guessing” almost impossible. This also outlaws absurdly long criteria with many conditions.

Monday, April 22, 2024

Personal Criteria

As it has been 48 hours, I now have a Personal Criteria of Bird.

Personal Criteria

As it has been 48 hours, I now have a Personal Criteria of Bird.

Story Post: Upgrade Request: Snap 37

Exceeded quorum, 5-0. Processed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 23 Apr 2024 14:27:30 UTC

I believe that Snap 037 Bounty meets the upgrade benchmark for:

“A Snap, posted after 19 April, to which the Observer has responded saying that he finds it aesthetically pleasing”

Proposal: I forgot how fast this game was

Timed out, 3-1 with 1 DEF. Enacted by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 24 Apr 2024 18:32:52 UTC

Grant all players who comment or vote on this proposal 5 score for participation

I don’t want to go idle but I probably deserve to

Mentmore

JonathanDark will act as Xebec’s mentor.

Award: Grand Prix in Advertising Photography

I claim the “Grand Prix in Advertising Photography” for guessing another Seeker’s Criterion.

Award: Fine Art Photographer of the Year

With more than 200 Score I claim “Fine Art Photographer of the Year”.

Criterion Refresh

I refresh my Criterion of “Camera is clearly angled downwards. kxj” (80494b98cac922f620f8a26ed125439706f8aafeb8576017f95822c0faa712f0)

Last criteria reset for a bit

Hopefully my last criteria reset for a bit:

Contains the username Kevan or Josh
b5a2f7e3ede0a0d08cdac898256f79867dd35e723fd360e22cca8a67f6d8e9ea

Story Post: Snap 038: Carnivore in the Garden Redeux

A few more criteria changes

Changing my 3rd and 5th Private Criteria (4th was reset due to Kevan’s correct Guess):

Contains an even number of letters on paper
31cca6dfee161290c417b0b6ac2c631ab7c5a25dd4abf284cd57e867663334f5

Contains something blue
a335b14fd8ccc861b2b8f26f0e454047d24e17c83c90e1b5c595c3eb1b8b9e54

JonathanDark Claims Conceptual Balance For Real

For real this time: I claim Conceptual Balance due to my 1st Private Criteria which has a Satisfying score of 4 and an Unsatisfying score of 4, where those scores were obtained from 8 contiguous Authentic Shots all taken after 8 April 2024

Sunday, April 21, 2024

Story Post: Snap 037: Bounty

I would like to become a player

Hi BlogNomic, I’m Xebec, I would like to become a player.

handle on discord is @radioactivecauliflowerstew. Got here from Infinite Nomic, my name on there is “google” (using something slightly less confusing for here but on second thoughts having two different names might be more confusing). Anyway, hello. Looking forward to meet everyone.

Story Post: A Guess

I guess that one of Jonathan Dark’s Private Criteria is that the photo must contain some water.

JonathanDark Claims Conceptual Balance (illegal)

I claim the Conceptual Balance award for my 5th Private Criteria which has a Satisfying score of 4 and an Unsatisfying score of 4, where those scores were obtained from 8 contiguous Authentic Shots all taken after 8 April 2024

Claimed too soon, please ignore.

Story Post: Snap 037: Carnivore in the Garden (illegal do not respond to this)

(Snap removed because it was taken too soon. I need to wait until April 22 UTC.)

Criteria Changeout

Changing my second criteria:

Contains the sky at night
77683063a39b2af4f0fd5e0db69c4bad7aa4307ed80e5a5b42fb4ebdbf62c31b

@NadNavillus: note that it was “the sky at night”, which is not equivalent to “night” or “dark” because you could take Shots of either without having the night sky in them.

Story Post: Snap 036: Beach

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Personal Criteria Request for Juniper

I nominate myself for a Personal Criteria.