A few things:
-Pouch should probably be added to the table too
-Papoose doesn’t seem to have definition
-how the symbolic names work in practice?

I don’t think Pouch needs to be added to the table, and in fact I think that would have the perverse outcome of making generic, untitled Pouches purchases available.

Papoose is an artefact of a previous draft; removed.

“Pouch xyzab” is my anticipated title format.

The problem with the table is that it says “The following types of Possession exist”, so one could perhaps argue that Pouch doesn’t exist, which might even make the phrase “all of their existing Pouches” ambiguous

The rule says “a name comprised of a combination of 5 symbols”, so wouldn’t the pouch names be things like “✨💣🤖🛑🧠”, without the word “Pouch” at all?

@Kevan Sure, why not?

@Desertfrog The statement you refer to isn’t exclusive; if I had a handful of marbles and said “these marbles exist” it wouldn’t preclude the existence of other marbles.

You gave “Pouch xyzab” as the intended format in your comment, was all.

I think I don’t have a problem with the naming convention being established through play.

CDDA flashbacks…

Why is the value privately tracked? Its derivable information, as you can know how much someone spent.

Overall seems fine though

Does referring to the wiki page of symbols make it gsmestate? I think it would have to; otherwise anyone could edit that page and render a pouch name illegal.

maybe I’m just stupid but I don’t really understand the point of these Pouches, plus the emoji names feel very impractical

[JonathanDark] Yes, “All wiki pages that the rules and Building Blocks explicitly mention [..] and any images or Templates contained within (or indirectly invoked by Templates contained within) those Wiki Pages are assumed to be Gamestate.” - although invoking it on an automatically-populated category page is unusual and has some wrinkles. I’m not sure what the legality would be of a player adding [[Category:Pictogram Templates]] to another template or wiki page to make it appear in this list, but it sounds like it would count as modifying gamestate.

Mild Gardener against per Desertfrog.

This sounds like it could lead to robbing other players at some point? That seems fine with me.

Pickpocketing was my imagined endpoint, yes!