Monday, January 26, 2009

Proposal: Adding elation to Inflation

Timed Out
-Amnistar

Adminned at 28 Jan 2009 09:37:10 UTC

Since my previous proposal disappeared, I’ll try it again.

Replace the text of rule “Selling” with:

At any time, a Member may place a Price Tag on a Recipe on eir Bowl. The Price Tag is a text in the form of “[X Credits]” that is appended to the end of a Recipe’s Name. X is known as the Price of that Recipe, and may be a number from 1 to 100. A Price Tag cannot be place on a Recipe that already has a Price Tag.

A Member may Purchase any Recipe with a Price Tag, by transfering an amount of their Credits to the Recipe’s owner, equal to the Price of that Recipe, and moving that Recipe into their Table.

For each vote on this Proposal that includes the text, “Inflation is fun”, the Writer obtains 30 Credits.

The purpose of giving me credits is to allow me to purchase Recipes from you if no one else has the money (or interest) for buying them.

 

 

posted by arthexis at 26 Jan 2009 17:22:01 UTC Comments (53)

Comments

arthexis: he/him

26-01-2009 17:34:32 UTC

for Explicit Author FOR Inflation is Fun

Kevan: he/him

26-01-2009 17:35:14 UTC

for

Klisz:

26-01-2009 17:36:57 UTC

for  Inflation sucks, but inflation is fun anyway.

Amnistar: he/him

26-01-2009 17:41:08 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Clucky: he/him

26-01-2009 18:01:41 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Clucky: he/him

26-01-2009 18:02:14 UTC

for Inflation is fun (or did we already define our terms properly so that my first vote doesn’t count anymore)?

arthexis: he/him

26-01-2009 20:56:41 UTC

Also I just noticed that this rule will need a fix: After being purchased, the Price Tag should be removed, otherwise someone else can just buy it back.

Wakukee:

26-01-2009 23:04:28 UTC

imperial

Gnauga:

26-01-2009 23:08:50 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Darknight: he/him

26-01-2009 23:11:06 UTC

for

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:54:06 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:54:50 UTC

for Inflation is fun (every vote, not every valid vote)

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:55:15 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:55:32 UTC

for Inflation is fun for the DDA

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:56:04 UTC

for Inflation is fun…

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:56:35 UTC

for Inflation is FUN!

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:57:00 UTC

for Inflation is fun and loopholes are more fun

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:57:27 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:57:59 UTC

for I’m flooding the country with cash!  Inflation is fun!

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:58:34 UTC

for Inflation is fun!

Rodlen:

26-01-2009 23:59:07 UTC

for 11 Inflation is fun

11 from me so far.

Qwazukee:

27-01-2009 00:01:15 UTC

for I don’t even need to say that inflation is fun. . . .

Rodlen:

27-01-2009 00:08:06 UTC

for Inflation is fun

Rodlen:

27-01-2009 00:10:12 UTC

for Loophole ABUSE.  Inflation is fun

Rodlen:

27-01-2009 00:12:27 UTC

for Inflation is fun.

Wakukee:

27-01-2009 01:27:06 UTC

“If a Member of the Staff uses more than one Voting Icon in comments on a Pending Proposal, his Vote is the last voting icon he uses.” Your only vote is your last one Rod. Stop spamming the comments. Why don’t you use your comment editing to erase all those extras?

Gnauga:

27-01-2009 01:27:55 UTC

Well, the last voting icon you used, Rodlen, was the for icon. Therefore, your vote counts as a single ‘for’. No loophole here, folks.

Gnauga:

27-01-2009 01:30:32 UTC

Posted at the same time as Wakkers.

Wakukee:

27-01-2009 01:33:02 UTC

Wakkers? Wakkers?!? WAKKERS?!!!!!!? No. Just no, Gnauga.

Gnauga:

27-01-2009 01:43:25 UTC

Yes. I dub thee Sir Wakkers.

Wooden Squid:

27-01-2009 02:16:43 UTC

for wakka wakka wakka

Darknight: he/him

27-01-2009 02:18:42 UTC

Pac-Man?

Klisz:

27-01-2009 03:19:53 UTC

WAKKERS!

I will now begin calling Wak Wakkers and Qwaz Qwazzers.

Qwazukee:

27-01-2009 03:41:43 UTC

Fair enough. Darth Cliche . . . DC . . . DC Comics . . . I will now begin calling Darth Cliche “Wonder Woman.”

Darknight: he/him

27-01-2009 03:44:07 UTC

*hides before the nicknames find him

Rodlen:

27-01-2009 03:58:42 UTC

Just call me RADLEN, RODLAN, ROLEN, ROLAN, RIDLAN, RODLYN, RODLEN, or ROEDLAN.

Rodlen:

27-01-2009 04:10:53 UTC

Or RAWLIN.

Yoda:

27-01-2009 04:35:46 UTC

for I think we have enough inflations.

Clucky: he/him

27-01-2009 04:43:55 UTC

Darth is totally Dark Chile.

Wakukee:

27-01-2009 04:59:52 UTC

“A Member of the Staff may only change her name as a result of a proposal approving the change.”
I declare all of these nick-names illegal. Don’t make me CFJ this…

Wakukee:

27-01-2009 05:17:51 UTC

I’m serious.

Yoda:

27-01-2009 05:53:39 UTC

That’s only in reference to your official name.  The rules don’t care what we call you.  We could call you “Tiddlywinks” but that wouldn’t affect gamestate in any way because your Blognomic username is still Wakukee.

So, Tiddlywinks, is that a good enough explanation for you?

Wakukee:

27-01-2009 06:58:31 UTC

‘sob.’
Why???

Klisz:

27-01-2009 17:43:45 UTC

Qwaz, I will begin calling you Qwaz again if you begin calling me Darth or DC again.

And given that Wak hasn’t even done anything to me, I will call him Wak again.

Qwazukee:

27-01-2009 18:02:17 UTC

do italics work in comments?

Qwazukee:

27-01-2009 18:02:36 UTC

Yes!

Qwazukee:

27-01-2009 18:25:23 UTC

^^ I already knew I could include italics in text, Wak should stop playing with my account.

Of course, Darth. Just making a point.  : p

Wakukee:

27-01-2009 18:54:29 UTC

Sorry! Try logging off so that I don’t accidentally post as you!

Yoda:

28-01-2009 12:49:49 UTC

Oh, and DK (or is it Donkey Kong?), you can’t hide from the nicknames forever…

Amnistar: he/him

28-01-2009 16:25:01 UTC

...wow….Writer is gonna get a crapload of credits….

Klisz:

28-01-2009 16:52:51 UTC

Yoda: Evidently my idea for a Darknight nickname wasn’t very original…

Sparrow:

28-01-2009 16:54:41 UTC

for

Klisz:

28-01-2009 16:54:50 UTC

I’m not even going to try to enact this…