Sunday, February 26, 2006

Call for Judgment: Final solution

0-10.  Would’ve been 0-11 if I wasn’t Idle. Fails like a sack of bricks sinks.  Also, to whomever made this CfJ: an investigation into why the title is offensive might be a good idea on your part.  Just FYI. 

—Excalabur
(Doesn’t usually use the admin box to make value judgments.  Will today.)

Adminned at 27 Feb 2006 05:51:34 UTC

Idle Captain/Bucky.  E may not request to be unidled.

Comments

Angry Grasshopper:

26-02-2006 22:01:37 UTC

What for?

against

Bucky:

26-02-2006 22:04:09 UTC

against !!!!!!!!!!

Elias IX:

26-02-2006 23:06:09 UTC

against Arrr, that’s too harsh.

Hix:

26-02-2006 23:08:31 UTC

against.  I find the title of this CfJ extremely offensive.  No wonder it’s anonymous.

Elias IX:

26-02-2006 23:16:34 UTC

Are Calls for Judgment veto-able?

Shadowclaw:

26-02-2006 23:17:28 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

26-02-2006 23:26:27 UTC

against Pft.

Banja:

26-02-2006 23:36:33 UTC

against
Besides, I’m not entirely sure that this CfJ is legal, considering rule 1.6

Elias IX:

26-02-2006 23:47:04 UTC

On a side note, it’s too bad that proposals don’t collect this many comments in as short a period of time.

smith:

27-02-2006 02:25:33 UTC

against Uh-oh, I didn’t mean to incite this: my venting was about what actions we shouldn’t allow in the game, not which players. This isn’t fair. I think anyone deserves at least a warning and an explanation of their offense before being expelled.

Angry Grasshopper:

27-02-2006 02:31:33 UTC

Have we ever expelled a player before? Having read the history casually, I recall that some players have quit in frustration, at that at least one was stripped of Emperorhood by CfJ, but I don’t remember any bannings.

Any, uh, Old Ones remember? Heheh.. Ia!

Bucky:

27-02-2006 02:36:37 UTC

Whoever wrote this either didn’t realize what e was asking for, didn’t care, or was WAY ahead o’ me.

smith:

27-02-2006 05:06:15 UTC

We’ve force-idled players before (in the Illuminati Dynasty), but it wasn’t targetting a single player, and it wasn’t indefinitely.

The Lone Amigo:

27-02-2006 05:09:27 UTC

against

Hell no.

Josh: he/they

27-02-2006 10:01:45 UTC

against No, we’ve never forcably expelled a player, at least to my knowledge.

Josh: he/they

27-02-2006 10:02:07 UTC

Although it has been tempting a few times.

Excalabur:

27-02-2006 13:47:52 UTC

Also, e’s pulling a perfectly legal exploit.  If I’d noticed it, I’d've been very tempted to do the same thing. 

Glad to see this failed.