Tuesday, March 01, 2011

Proposal: old time religion

Self-Killed. -Purplebeard

Adminned at 04 Mar 2011 00:10:33 UTC

until the learn grunt: “great sky eagle” passes, this proposal has no effect.

if and when the learn grunt: “great sky eagle” passes, change the first paragraph of rule 2.3.1 balance to the following:

the collection of all cavemen has a social order, which is thought of as four numbers: w, x, y, and z. Here, w is the total number of cavemen with the pursuit religion, x is the total number of cavemen with the pursuit knowledge, y is the total number of cavemen with the pursuit art and z is the total number of cavemen with the pursuit progress. these four numbers together reveal the balance of the social order. the highest value denotes the apex pursuit. the lowest value denotes the nadir pursuit.

to go with josh’s addition of religion.

Comments

Josh: he/they

01-03-2011 21:30:12 UTC

imperial I like what you’re doing, but thought that religion might work better as an alternative to the existing scientific structure than a new addition to it.

Subrincinator:

01-03-2011 21:46:34 UTC

that could be interesting.  how would it work?

Saakara:

02-03-2011 01:00:35 UTC

for

Antaeus:

02-03-2011 04:10:28 UTC

imo, cavemen lives in uncertainty. to deal with this they look for help from beyond reality but at the same time they are adapters and learn.

help from beyond reality can be represented in a religion structure where they seek protectors in the form of animals that maybe connect somehow to types of help or benefit cavemen get for worshiping that animal

and learning represented by scientific structure in place now

Subrincinator:

02-03-2011 07:47:38 UTC

to be quite literal about this, in history science and religion were the same thing until the enlightenment.  people tracked the stars for religion and made science of the stars.  and so forth.  i don’t think cavemen should or would think of their research into the world of the unseen as anything separate from other pursuits.

Purplebeard:

02-03-2011 14:11:22 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

02-03-2011 14:13:22 UTC

Actually,  against  Having an invisible rule that suddenly pops into existence when a learn grunt with a certain name passes is both inelegant and potentially dangerous.

Blacky:

02-03-2011 20:21:48 UTC

against When my CfJ passes the learn grunt great sky eagle will be gone. Would be dangerous to have a proposal linger around when anyone can make a new learn grunt called great sky eagle

Subrincinator:

02-03-2011 20:33:28 UTC

ooh, that could be fun—of course the learn grunt would still have to pass in order for this proposal to take effect.  but that could be fun, a lingering invisible rule.  nevertheless:  against s/k