This is more of a question than anything else.
Rule 2.13.1 defines a law as
A Law is a Dynastic Rule proposed to be added to the Ruleset by the Blognomicker in question.
Yet from the context I cannot figure out who the Blognomicker in question is. Am I missing something or is the rule missing something.
Im just trying to make sense of what hooks there are and what has been defined etc.
I read it as a Blognomicker who is a member of Congress, but it is poorly worded.
Darth if that is the case than any and all proposals are laws. Which is okay I just want a definitive version of the meaning.
Galdyn: Yeah, I think that’s what it’s supposed to mean; “by the Blognomicker in question” ought to be removed, though.
I agree with lilomar on this one: I think the author of the proposal intended it to refer to a member of Congress, as I doubt he just wanted to change the word ‘proposal’.
I personally think a CfJ is in order for this issue: we seem to have at least 3 Blognomickers ‘actively disagreeing.’ What do you guys think?
h2g2guy: It doesn’t matter which interpretation is correct (also, proposals that merely change the gamestate, or the core rules, are not laws).
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Klisz:
The Blognomicker in question is the Blognomicker who makes the proposal.