1. A Soldier shall not make a post or comment with a question about the existance of the Enemy.
-Arth disputed this, no response.
2. A Soldier shall not make a post or comment with a question about the lack of Skirmishes - Disputed by Rodlen, no response.
- Rule disputed by Rodlen, no reponse, Rodlen gains 5 loyalty
-This rule has been disputed and removed
Disputing order #4 as well.
Reason: Makes no sense to bar a letter’s use. Also, the second half of the order could be considered flavor text and therefor not part of the order.
Disputing Order #4
Reasons: How am I ever gonna become an admin? : (
Query: Quoth Quincey Questioning Quite Quaintly how Qualified the Quarantine of Q is…
(no dispute, just fun to try and write.)
While it is understandable that the presence of the letter Q is often times helpful, it is important to realize that the letter was first invented by the Enemy. We do not wish to advertise to them that we are, in fact, using their letters.
It should also be noted that these rules do not apply retroactively, thus it is impossible for them to be broken within the post which they are made.
Darknight: Yes, that was the point, I was highlighting the fact that comment was not stated in the rule, unlike the others.
Uh…does everyone that disputed the rule lose loyalty? Or just wak?
well, I propose someone clean it up then. I’m busy killing myself.
“Do something to player X where X is replaced by the first name mentioned in a comment to this proposal by the creator of this proposal.” A bit complicated but it works. Bit useless now the order has been removed though.
I’m only expected to follow orders. I don’t have to, so:
Does the Enemy even exist? Why aren’t we getting any Skirmishes? Why aren’t there any available weapons?
We have great weapons. Skirmishes are our heroic battles that we shall WAGE!!!! The Enemy is Eastasia…Eurasia…Eastasia…Eurasia…DAMMIT.
Disputing Order #3
Reason: Anybody who asks a question about the lack of weapons would be an idiot, as we have many great and amazing weapons. That is enough of a punishment.
Disputing Order #1
The order is badly written (Sorry to tell you this General, but a brave soldier must always speak the truth). The way it is written, it allows traitors to actually declare the non existance of the enemy in an imperative manner! This is clearly against the spirit of the order and should be corrected with new orders.
Dispution Order #2
Reason: Outdated. We have had our first great battle. We no longer lack skirmishes.
Disputing Order #2
Reason: There is no longer any “lack of Skirmishes” to question.
Still, it was incredibly close. I bet I clicked the submit button at the same time as you, my net’s just incredibly slow.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Wakukee:
Disputing order #4
Reasons: What the?!? Why? The others are fair to reduce heckling, but this? Really? Q’s are often an intergral part of posts. Plus you just broke your own rule ; ).