Sunday, April 03, 2011

Proposal: Oh this is Odd, after changes upon changes, it’s more or less the same.

s/k, Failing. ~ lilomar

Adminned at 04 Apr 2011 21:39:15 UTC

If rule Oddities exists, change the last two paragraphs in rule Oddities with:

Any Station with one or more Oddities or a pending Odd Proposal related to it shall be considered Odd.
A Normal (not Odd) Station may become Odd only by Odd Proposals. Odd Proposal are posted in the category “Proposal”, start with the word “Odd:” and do not count as Proposals for the purpose of the first sentence in rule 1.3 “Proposals”.
The only effect of an Odd Proposal shall be adding an Oddity to a Normal Station. Any Player may only write Odd Proposals related to the Normal Station they are in, if any. That Station shall be named in the title of the Proposal.

When a Player leaves, by any mean, a Normal Station, they shall lose 1 Ticket. When an Odd Proposal is enacted, the Player who wrote it gets 2 Tickets. When an Odd Proposal is failed, the author loses 3 Tickets, and every Player that voted against it loses one Ticket.

If not, and rule “Oddities and States” contains 4 paragraphs, replace the last two with the quoted text.
If not, and rule “Oddities and States” contains 2 paragraphs, add the quoted text to that rule.

Making Odd Proposals more important, and adding a toll to pay to avoid writing them. I gave them the monopoly in making new Odd stations, while Oddities may be amended or deleted by normal Proposals.

Comments

Subrincinator:

03-04-2011 16:14:43 UTC

for I don’t like the ticket-losing mechanism.  But I like the rest.

Roujo: he/him

03-04-2011 16:34:52 UTC

for

lilomar:

03-04-2011 16:49:34 UTC

imperial

Ely:

03-04-2011 17:15:17 UTC

@Subricinator Yes I’m not completely sure about it, but after all, it’s just one stinky ticket you can avoid to pay by making a one-line Proposal.

Josh: Observer he/they

03-04-2011 20:10:28 UTC

against Encouraging spam proposals doesn’t seem like much fun. I’d vote for it without the disincentive/

Ely:

03-04-2011 20:36:47 UTC

Ok, if this fails, I’ll propose it again without. Let’s sit and see.

Purplebeard:

03-04-2011 21:34:58 UTC

against

ais523:

03-04-2011 23:23:57 UTC

against A little complex…

Chivalrybean:

04-04-2011 00:06:09 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

04-04-2011 03:18:43 UTC

imperial

Saakara:

04-04-2011 03:47:03 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

04-04-2011 08:14:47 UTC

against

Subrincinator:

04-04-2011 08:19:45 UTC

against cov per Josh.  Ely, if you repost with the suggested change, I’ll vote for.

Ely:

04-04-2011 12:28:48 UTC

against s/k