Idling Cpt_Koen. Quorum drops to 3.

Change the text of paragraph 2 of the rule “Pie Quota” to the following:

If performing some action results in at least one Baker having more than 20 Pies, then those Bakers must immediately lose Empty pies—or, if the Baker has no Empty pies, pies of the flavor they own that comes first in alphabetical order—one by one until their total is exactly 20.  Once the total reaches 20, these automatic losses stop.  To clarify: due to the rule of “Empty pies first, then alphabetical order,” Bakers have no choice in which pies will be trashed in this way.

Add a new flavor of pie called “Magnetic” to the list of pies. Add “Input: 1 Empty Pie 1 Warp Pie. Output: 1 Magnetic Pie” to the list of upgrades.

Add the following to the end of “Locations”

A Baker may spend 1 Magnetic pie to change another Baker’s Location to their own, provided the target Baker could make the same move himself by spending a single Warp pie. (so for example, a Baker whose location is not the Foyer or Far Away cannot target a Baker whose location is Far Away in this manner)

Add a subrule called “Pie Trashing” to the Dynastic rule “Pies”.

Give this new subrule the following text:

At any time, A Baker may decrease their number of any flavor of pie by as much as they like, as long as the final, lower value is non-negative.

Add a subrule called “Pie Trashing” to the Dynastic rule “Pies”.

Give this new subrule the following text:

At any time, A Baker may decrease their number of any flavor of pie by as much as they like, as long as the final, lower value is non-negative.

If the Proposal titled “More Routes to Take” failed, this Proposal does nothing.

Remove the line “Spend 1 Grand Pie and receive 20 Cream Pies.” from the rule “Locations”

Revert the text of the rule “Pie Quota” back to the following:

Whenever a Baker has more than 10 Pies of a certain flavor, the number of their Pies of that flavor is set to 10.

A Baker cannot have more than 20 Pies in total. If performing some action would result in at least one Baker having more than 20 Pies, that action may not be performed.

Add the following as a subrule to the dynastic rule “Pies,” with the title “Grandest Baker”:

If a Baker spends 24 continuous hours in which their number of Grand pies is always at least 3 and their Position is never Out, then that Baker has achieved victory.

Southpointingchariot becomes idle. Quorum remains 4.

Add the locations “Fruit Orchard”, “Pumpkin Patch”, and “Royal Ovens” to the list of locations.

Add “Cherry”, “Strawberry”, “Blueberry”, “Pumpkin” and “Spiced Pumpkin”, “Medley” and “Grand” to the list of pies.

Add “Input: 1 Empty Pie, Output: 1 Pumpkin Pie”, “Input: 1 Cherry Pie, 1 Blueberry Pie, 1 Strawberry Pie. Output: 1 Medley Pie.”, and “Input: 2 Pumpkin Pies. Output: 1 Spiced Pumpkin Pie” to the list of upgrades.

add the following before the last sentence of the rule “Locations”

If a Baker’s Location is the Fruit Orchard and possess at least one empty pie, when he performs the upgrade action instead of picking an upgrade he may choose to do the following (if he does so, it still counts as having performed the action, so is still ineligible to receive the free empty pie at the end of that day): spend 1 empty pie and roll a DICE3. If the result is a 1, gain a Cherry Pie. If the result is a 2, gain a Blueberry Pie, if the result is a 3, gain a Strawberry Pie.

If a Baker’s Location is the Pumpkin Patch, the upgrades “Input: 1 Empty Pie, Output: 2 Pumpkin Pies”, “Input: 2 Empty Pies, Output: 3 Pumpkin Pies” and “Input: 4 Empty Pies, Output: 4 Pumpkin Pies” all become available to that Baker when choosing an upgrade for the upgrade action. .

If a Baker’s Location is the Royal Ovens, the upgrade “Input: 1 Medley Pie, 1 Dutch Apple Pie, 1 Spiced Pumpkin Pie: Output: 1 Grand Pie” becomes available to that Baker when choosing an upgrade for the upgrade action. .

in the rule “Locations” replace

If a Baker’s Location is the Creamatorium, the upgrades “Input: 1 Apple Pie, Output: 2 Cream Pies” and “Input: 1 Dutch Apple Pie, Output: 4 Cream Pies” both become available to that Baker when choosing an upgrade for the upgrade action.

with

If a Baker’s Location is the Creamatorium, when he performs the upgrade action instead of picking an upgrade he may choose to do the following (if he does so, it still counts as having performed the action, so is still ineligible to receive the free empty pie at the end of that day):

Spend 1 Apple, Pumpkin, Cherry, Strawberry or Blueberry Pie and receive 2 Cream Pies.
Spend 1 Dutch Apple Pie and receive 4 Cream Pies
Spend 1 Spiced Pumpkin Pie and receive 5 Cream Pies
Spend 1 Medley Pie and receive 9 Cream Pies
Spend 1 Grand Pie and receive 20 Cream Pies.
(note that in order to spend these pies, the Baker must possess at least one of the pie he is spending)

In the rule “Pie Quota” replace

Whenever a Baker has more than 10 Pies of a certain flavor, the number of their Pies of that flavor is set to 10.

A Baker cannot have more than 20 Pies in total. If performing some action would result in at least one Baker having more than 20 Pies, that action may not be performed.

with

Whenever a Baker has more than 10 Pies of a certain flavor, the number of their Pies of that flavor is set to 10. Cream pies are an exception to this rule, a Baker may have up to 20 cream pies. Whenever a Baker has more than 20 cream pies, the number of their Cream Pies is set to 20.

A Baker cannot have more than 20 non Cream Pies in total. If performing some action would result in at least one Baker having more than 20 non Cream Pies, that action may not be performed.

although he commented in GNDT… Quorum is now 4.

Add “Far Away” to the list of valid Locations in the rule “Locations”.

Replace the last paragraph of the rule “Locations” with the following:

A Baker with at least one Warp pie may spend a Warp pie (i.e., reduce their number of Warp pies by exactly one) to take one of the following actions:

Change their current Location to any other valid Location, provided neither the starting nor ending location is Far Away
Change their Location from Foyer to Far Away
Change their Location from Far Away to Foyer

Only one of the above actions may be chosen per Warp Pie spent, and the action chosen may be executed only once per Warp Pie spent.

In the rule “Locations”, replace

’ or “Science Lab” ‘

with

’ “Science Lab”, or “Graveyard” ‘

after

“If a Baker’s Location is the Science Lab, if he is targeted by a Portal Pie neither is Position or Pies swap with the attacker.”

add the line

“If a Baker’s Location is the Graveyard and he is not Out, He may name an Out Baker, spend 1 Cream Pie (provided he has one) and roll a DICE3. If the result is a 1, the targeted Baker’s hits increase by one.”

In the rule “Time Out” after

‘If a Baker’s position is Out, they cannot target or be targeted as part of “The Holy War” or “The Holy Dance”. ‘

add

“If a Baker’s position is Out, there Location becomes the Graveyard, and they their location cannot be changed by any means while they remain Out”.

In the Dynastic Rule “Time Out,” change both instances of “15” to “10”.  This will cause the rule to read as follows:

If a Baker’s Hits is ever greater than or equal to 10, the Baker’s Position becomes Out. If a Baker’s position is Out, they cannot target or be targeted as part of “The Holy War” or “The Holy Dance”.
If a Baker’s position is Out, they may, as a weekly action, remove five of their Hits. If as a result their Hits become less than 10, their Position is immediately set to the smallest positive integer which is not currently a Position held by another Baker.
If there is only one Baker who is in the Holy Circle, that Baker has achieved victory.

Add a subrule named “Out of Sight, Out of Mind” to the rule 2.3 “The Holy Circle” with the following text:

If a Baker’s position is Out, then they may not be the trader or the tradee of any trade as part of the rule “Trading”.

If a Baker becomes out while they are the trader or the tradee of any pending trade, then any such trade is immediately cancelled.

Rewrite the rule “The Holy Circle” (not affecting its subrules) so that it reads:

Each Baker may have a spot in the Holy Circle, tracked in the GNDT in a column called “Position”. A Baker is said to be in the Holy Circle if their Position is a positive integer. A Baker is said to be outside the Holy Circle if their Position is “Out”. Two Bakers in the Holy Circle cannot have the same Position.

If there is a positive integer N such that a) no Baker has Position N and b) some Baker has position N+1, that Baker’s position immediately becomes N. Whenever a Baker unidles or joins the dynasty for the first time their Position becomes the smallest positive integer which is not currently a Position held by another Baker, unless they are unidling and previously held the position of “Out”, in which case their position remains Out.

The Distance between two Bakers in the Holy Circle with Positions A and B, with B bigger than A, is equal to the minimum of B - A and A + T - B where T is the number of Bakers in the Holy Circle. (Distance is commutative, so if B is less than A it would be equal to the minimum of A - B and B + T - A). Two Bakers in the Holy Circle are Adjacent if the Distance between them is 1. The distance between a Baker and himself is zero.

In the rule “The Holy Dance”, replace “where N is the number of Bakers” with “where N is the number of Bakers in the Holy Circle”.

Rewrite the rule “Time Out” so it reads:

If a Baker’s Hits is ever greater than or equal to 15, the Baker’s Position becomes Out. If a Baker’s position is Out, they cannot target or be targeted as part of “The Holy War” or “The Holy Dance”.

If a Baker’s position is Out, they may, as a weekly action, remove five of their Hits. If as a result their Hits become less than 15, their Position is immediately set to the smallest positive integer which is not currently a Position held by another Baker.

If there is only one Baker who is in the Holy Circle, that Baker has achieved victory.

In the Dynastic Rule called “Upgrades,” remove the text “If a Baker does not perform this action during a day, they gain one Empty Pie at the end of that day unless this is prohibited by the “Pie Quota” rule.”

Add a new subrule to the rule “Upgrades” called “Daily Deliveries”, with the following text:

Each Baker gains exactly one Empty pie at the end of each day, unless the Baker explicitly chooses NOT to gain this Empty pie or gaining the pie is prohibited by the “Pie Quota” rule.

The first piece is always a wash, a poorly mangled pastry.
The second piece gets eaten, because it’s so tasty.
The third piece too big, from poorly aimed knives.
And the fourth goes to charity, so the children may thrive.

The last slice remaining is useful, it may seem,
To wedge between Bakers and squeeze in between.
Changing Positions is of use in this War
Whether trying to flee or trying to score.

Add “Wedge” to the list of available pie flavors.  Add “Input: 1 non-Empty pie.  Output: 1 Wedge Pie” to this list of upgrades.  “Input: 1 non-Empty pie.” means that any flavor of pie except Empty can be used for an Input in this upgrade.

Add a new subrule to “The Holy Circle” called “Moving Seats” with the following text:

If a Baker possesses at least one Wedge Pie, they may reduce their Wedge Pies by one and choose a new Position for themselves, which may be any value between 1 and B, where B is the number of active Bakers.  When a Baker changes their Position in this way to value N, any other Bakers with Position greater than or equal to N immediately increase their Position value by exactly 1.

When a Wedge pie is used in this way, only after (but immediately after) the above Position changes are made as a result of that use will the rule “If there is a positive integer N such that a) no Baker has Position N and b) some Baker has position N+1, that Baker’s position immediately becomes N” from “The Holy Circle” above be enacted, if applicable.

Add a new flavor of pie called “Wall” and the upgrade “Input: 1 Cream Pie. Output: 1 Wall Pie, 1 Empty Pie”

Add a new flavor of pie called “Towel” and the upgrade “Input: 1 Wall Pie, 2 Empty Pies. Output: 1 Towel Pie”

In the rule “Holy War” replace

If the result is a 1or N + 1, the Target is hit in the face by the Pie and their Hits are increased by one.

with

If the result is a 1 or N + 1, the Target is hit in the face by the Pie. If the target has any Wall Pies, their Wall Pies are reduced by one. Otherwise their Hits are increased by one.

Add a subrule to “The Holy Circle” called “Drying Off” and give it the following text

If a Baker has at least one Towel Pie, they may reduce their Towel Pies by one and also reduce their Hits by one.

scshunt and moonroof both idle. Quorum is now 5.

Add a new subrule to “The Holy Circle” called “Time Out” and give it the following text

If a Baker’s Hits is ever greater than or equal to 15, the baker’s position becomes Out. If a Baker’s position is Out, they are not considered to be in the Holy Circle and cannot target or target as part of “Holy War” or “The Holy Dance”. If a Baker’s position is Out, they may, as a weekly action, remove five of their Hits and set their position as if they were a new player.

If every Baker but one’s position is Out, the Baker who is not Out has achieved victory.

In the rule “The Holy Circle” replace

Whenever a Baker unidles or joins the dynasty for the first time their Position becomes the smallest positive integer which is not currently a Position held by another Baker.

with

Whenever a Baker unidles or joins the dynasty for the first time their Position becomes the smallest positive integer which is not currently a Position held by another Baker, unless they are unidling and previously held the position of “Out”, in which case their position remains Out.

If the proposal “Return of The Apology” has passed, change the text of the rule “Trading” to the text contained in block quotes below.

Otherwise, create a new rule “Trading”, with the text of the rule set to the text contained in block quotes below.

As a daily action, a Baker (“the trader”) may request to trade their pies with one other Baker (“the tradee”) by making a post with TRADE, in all caps, in the title. The post must specify, the name of the tradee, which pies they wish to give, and the which pies they want to receive.

The trade is considered Pending until the trader cancels the trade by making a comment to the post containing the text “CANCEL”, in all caps, or the tradee accepts the trade by making a comment to the post containing the text “ACCEPT”, in all caps. Once a trade is canceled or accepted, it ceases to be pending. A non-Pending trade cannot be canceled nor accepted.

If the tradee accepts the trade, and if at that time the trader possesses all the pies they wished to give and the tradee possesses all the pies the trader wished to receive, then the pies the trader wished to give are transferred from the trader to the tradee, and the pies the trader wished to receive are transferred from the tradee to the trader.

You give me a pie
I’ll give you mine
I’ll give you your pie
That’ll be just fine

Then you give me my pie
I’ll give it back to you
And if you ask me why
Well, that’s just what we do

Create a new rule “Trading”, reading

At any time, a player may request to trade their pies with one other player by making a post with TRADE, in all caps, in the title, stating the name of the player they wish to trade with, as well as the flavor and amount of any pies, they wish to transfer, along with the same information for the pies they wish to receive from the player they wish to trade with. If the player they wish to trade with makes a comment to the post containing the text “ACCEPT”, in all caps, the trade is carried out.

If the proposal “Location Location Location” (or any other proposal that implements an identical Location mechanic) passes or has already passed, then enact the following rules changes:

Add “the Netherlands” to the list of Locations, and add the following the list of Location effects:

If a Baker’s location is the Netherlands, the only daily upgrade action available to that Baker is “Input: N Apple Pies, Output: N Dutch Apple Pies,” where N is equal to the number of Apple pies the Baker has before making the upgrade.

Add a new pie called “Warp”. Add a new upgraded “Input: 1 Empty Pie, Output: 2 Warp Pies”

Add a new dynastic rule called “Locations” and give it the following text

Each Baker has a Location which is tracked in the GNDT in a column called “Location”. All Bakers start in the Foyer. A Baker’s location may also be “Apple Farm”, “Creamatorium” or “Science Lab”.

If a Baker’s Location is the Apple Farm, the “Input: none, Output: 1 Apple Pie” upgrade becomes available to that Baker when choosing an upgrade for the upgrade action .

If a Baker’s Location is the Creamatorium, the upgrades “Input: 1 Apple Pie, Output: 2 Cream Pies” and “Input: 1 Dutch Apple Pie, Output: 4 Cream Pies” both become available to that Baker when choosing an upgrade for the upgrade action.

If a Baker’s Location is the Science Lab, if he is targeted by a Portal Pie neither is Position or Pies swap with the attacker

A Baker may spend 1 Warp Pie (provided of course he has one) to change his location to any other valid location.

in the rule “Holy War” replace

pick another Baker (the Target) other than himself

with

pick another Baker (the Target) in the same location as himself (other than himself)

To the rule “Pies”, add a subrule “Pie Quota” and give it the following text:

Whenever a Baker has more than 10 Pies of a certain flavor, the number of their Pies of that flavor is set to 10.

A Baker cannot have more than 20 Pies in total. If performing some action would result in at least one Baker having more than 20 Pies, that action may not be performed.

Upon enactment of this proposal, if some Baker has more than 20 Pies in total, replace all occurences of “20” in the second paragraph of the “Pie Quota” subrule with the maximum Total number of Pies held by any Baker.

Amend the rule called “Upgrades” by replacing “they gain one Empty Pie at the end of that day.” with

they gain one Empty Pie at the end of that day unless this is prohibited by the “Pie Quota” rule.

Amend Rule 2.2 (Upgrades) by appending the following {}-delimited text to the list of possible upgrades:

{
* Input: 2 Empty Pies. Output: 1 Portal Pie
}

Amend Rule 2.3.2 (The Holy Dance) by replacing “posses” with “possesses”, and “whose the Position” with “whose Position”.

Our Bakers in town have such varied abilities!
They need to show off their non-pie agility.
The first of these options, do not be mistaken.
Will be to remove the Hits they have taken.

1) In the rule currently called “Upgrades”, replace all text after the list of pie upgrade options with the following:

On a given day, if a Baker chooses not to take any of the above upgrade actions, they may perform exactly one of the following instead:

Reduce their Hits value by one, to a minimum of zero

If a Baker does not perform any of the above actions (Upgrades or otherwise) during a day, they gain one Empty Pie at the end of that day.

2) Rename the rule called “Upgrades” to “Pie Upgrades and Other Actions”.

Vovix idles out. Quorum remains 6.

If the proposal “Become a Master Baker” passes, give the title “Pie Points Victory” to the subrule it adds.

Add a new rule called “Winning Conditions”.  Add a subrule to “Winning Conditions” with the following text:

These bakers are judged by their delicious pies,
And so Pie Points shall bring their success or demise.
But how many points before one claims the crown?
“50 points marks a victor!” says the King of Town.

If the ruleset contains a rule named “The Holy Dance”,
replace in that rule “the Baker reduce their number of Portal Pies by one” with “the Baker may reduce their number of Portal Pies by one”
and “The Baker the Position equal” with “The Baker whose Position is equal”.

Of course if the Proposal at http://blognomic.com/blognomic/archive/now_youre_thinking_with_pies/ has failed, then this Proposal has no effect.

Add a new flavor of pie called “Portal”. If the proposal “Pies are very classy” passes, give it the Class “Utility”. Add “Input: 2 Empty Pies. Output: 1 Portal Pie” to the list of Upgrades.

Add a new subrule to “The Holy Circle” called “The Holy Dance” and give it the following text:

If a Baker (the Attacker) posses a Portal Pie, the Baker reduce their number of Portal Pies by one, and roll a DICEN where N is the number of Bakers. The Baker the Position equal to the result of the die roll is the Target. The Attacker and the Target then swap Positions and Pies. The Target then gains two Empty Pies.

Append the following to the rule first paragraph of the rule “Pies”

Each pie has a Class, which may either be None, Basic, Advanced, Utility, or Grand and is listed in parenthesis after the name of the pie

Give the Empty Pie the Class “None”, Apple Pie the class “Basic”, Dutch Apple Pie the class “Advanced” and Cream Pie the class “Utility”

Add the following pies: “Pumpkin” with the class “Basic”, “Spiced Pumpkin” with the class “Advanced” and “Applekin” with the class “Grand”

Add the following upgrades: “Input: 1 Empty Pie. Output: 1 Pumpkin Pie”, “Input: 1 Pumpkin Pie. Output: 1 Spiced Pumpkin Pie”, “Input: 1 Spiced Pumpkin Pie, 1 Dutch Apple Pie, Output: 1 Applekin Pie”

(I’m away from my adminning computer)

If the proposal titled “Bakers of the Round Table” failed, this proposal does nothing.

Add the following as a 3rd paragraph to the “Holy War” subrule:

If the Target is hit in the face by a pie in this way and they possess 1 or more Empty pies, then instead of the Target’s Hits being increased by 1, their number of Empty pies is decreased by 1, as they used the (now ruined) empty pie tin to defend the attack.

I would like to join as a player…er…Baker.

Totally new to this, but I’ve spent the last few hours doing my homework, and I think I’ve got a good grasp of it all.

Add a new dynastic rule called “The Holy Circle” with the following text

Each Baker has a spot in the Holy Circle, tracked in the GNDT in a column called “Position”. Two Bakers cannot have the same Position. If there is a positive integer N such that a) no Baker has Position N and b) some Baker has position N+1, that Baker’s position immediately becomes N. Whenever a Baker unidles or joins the dynasty for the first time their Position becomes the smallest positive integer which is not currently a Position held by another Baker.

The Distance between any two Bakers with Position A and B, with B bigger than A, is equal to the minimum of B - A and A + T - B where T is the number of Bakers. Two Bakers are Adjacent if the Distance between them is 1. (Distance is commutative, so if B is less than A it would be equal to the minimum of A - B and B + T - A). The distance between a Baker and himself is zero.

Add a subrule to this rule called Holy War

Each Baker has a number of Hits, which is a non-negative integer tracked in a GNDT column called “Hits”.

If a Baker (the Attacker) possess a Cream Pie, they may reduce their number of Cream Pies by one, pick another Baker (the Target) other than himself and roll a DICE(N+1) where N is the distance between the two Bakers. If the result is a 1or N + 1, the Target is hit in the face by the Pie and their Hits are increased by one.

Roll a DICEN where N is the number of non-idle Bakers without a Position, and assign the Xth non-idle Baker without a Position the smallest positive integer which no other Baker currently has. Repeat this process until all non-idle Bakers have a Position.

Add a new rule “Ha’pennies”, reading: “Each player has a non-negative integer of ha’pennies, tracked in the GNDT.”

Add a new rule “The Merchant”, reading: “southpointingchariot is the Merchant. The Merchant is not considered a player for the purpose of any other dynastic rule.”

Retitle the rule “Upgrades” as “Orders”, and change its text to read: “Each player has a set of orders, known to them and the Merchant. Each order is a list of 5 pie flavors, along with a unique ID Number. As a daily action, if a player has at least one ha’penny, they may spend one ha’penny to request orders by making a post with the text ORDER, in all caps, in the title. The Merchant should then randomly generate 2 orders for that player, as well as 1 for every other player. That player also receives 5 pies, and each other player 1 pie, the flavors of which are determined randomly by the Merchant.
If a player possesses the set of 5 pies listed in one of their orders, they may fulfill that order by making a post with the text FULFILL, in all caps, in the title, stating the ID number of the order they are fulfilling and the pies listed in the order. They then gain one ha’penny and lose those 5 pies”

Create a new rule “Trading”, reading “At any time, a player may trade their pies, orders, or ha’pennies with one other player by making a post with TRADE, in all caps, in the title, stating the name of the player they wish to trade with, as well as the flavor of any pies, the amount of ha’pennies, and/or the ID Number of any orders they wish to transfer, along with the same information for the items they wish to receive from the player they wish to trade with. If the player they wish to trade with responds , the trade is carried out.”

What? An open-ended dynasty just asking for someone to build mechanics in? Well, I think I’d like to be un-idled then.

Add “Empty” and “Dutch Apple” to the list of flavors of pie.

In the rule “Pies”, after “Bakers starts with zero of each flavor of pie by default.” add “When a Baker joins the dynasty for the first time, they gain a number of Empty Pies equal to the minimum Total number of pies held by any other Baker”

Create a rule called “Upgrades” and give it the following text

As a daily action, a baker may pick one of the Upgrades listed below and perform it. When a baker performs an upgrade, they must first spend all of the Input Pies listed for the Upgrade (if any exist) and then (provided they were able to spend the required Input Pies) they receive all of the Output Pies for the chosen Upgrade.

The possible upgrades are as follows:

Input: none. Output: 1 Empty Pie
Input: 1 Empty Pie. Output: 1 Apple Pie
Input: 1 Apple Pie: Output: 1 Dutch Apple Pie

If a Baker does not perform this action during a day, they gain one Empty Pie at the end of that day.

If this proposal: http://blognomic.com/archive/food_fight1/ passes, add “Input: 1 Empty Pie. Output: 1 Cream Pie” to the list of Upgrades.

If the Proposal titled “Laying the crustwork” failed, this Proposal does nothing.

Amend the dynastic rule called “Pies” by appending Cream to the list of Flavors.

I unidle.

Simon Says
Please unidle me

Add a new dynastic rule called “Pies” and give it the following text

Each Baker has a collection of Pies tracked in the GNDT in a column called “Pies”. Pies come in a number of different Flavors which are listed below. For each Baker, Pies field of the GNDT contains a comma separated list containing the number of Pies that Baker has in each flavor in the order the Flavors are listed below. (So if the Flavors are “Apple” “Rhubarb” and “Cherry” a worker with a Pies field of “3, 2, 0.5” has three Apple Pies, two Rhubarb Pies, and half a Cherry Pie). Bakers can only have non-negative amounts of each flavor of pie. The total number of Pies a Baker has is the sum of the number of pies of each Flavor he has, and is tracked for convenience in a GNDT column called “Total”. Bakers starts with zero of each flavor of pie by default.

The Flavors of Pie are as follows:

Apple

Repeal all dynastic rules. Replace “Demon” with “Simon” and “Farmer” with “Baker” throughout the ruleset

Per rule 2.8.1 Exorcism Attempt I have achieved victory.

Clucky has achieved victory :)

Quorum is now 3.

In the subrule entitled Exorcism Attempt, change “that Farmer may achieve victory” to “that Farmer has achieved victory”.

Repeal rule 2.3.

If the proposal “Permutations suck” passes, this proposal does nothing.

Replace the text of rule 2.8 “Sacred Things” with the following, but do not change its subrules:

There is a Sacred Word initially known only to the Demon. The Sacred Word is a four-letter English word. Each English letter that occurs in the Sacred Word is called a Sacred Letter, and any English letter may occur in the Sacred Word no more than once. Each Amulet is associated with exactly one Sacred Letter, which means that given the id of an Amulet, the Demon can name the Sacred Letter associated with that Amulet.

If the current Sacred Word contains any English letter more than once, the Demon must select a new Sacred Word. If any Amulet was associated with an English letter which no longer occurs in the Sacred Word, the Demon must tell each Farmer who had been told the Sacred Letter associated with that Amulet the Sacred Letter which is now associated with that Amulet, even if the Farmer no longer has a Manul which possesses that Amulet.

In the rule “Secret Disclosure”

replace “The Demon should then send a reply specifying the Sacred Letter that Amulet is associated with.” with

“The Demon should then send a reply specifying the Sacred Letter that Amulet is associated with and which position in the word that Secret Letter is.”

The Demon must tell each farmer who has already performed an Secret Disclosure this dynasty with the position(s) of each letter corresponding to the amulets they sent it and his earliest convince.

Add a new rule named “Sacred Things” with the text

There is a Sacred Word initially known only to the Demon. The Sacred Word is a four-letter English word. Each English letter that occurs in the Sacred Word is called a Sacred Letter. Each Amulet is associated with exactly one Sacred Letter, which means that given the id of an Amulet, the Demon can name the Sacred Letter associated with that Amulet.

Add a subrule to this rule named “Exorcism Attempt” and saying

As a weekly action, a Farmer may perform an Exorcism Attempt by sending a private message (PM) to the Demon with the topic “Exorcism Attempt” specifying a four-letter English word which he believes is the Sacred Word. If the Farmer names the Sacred Word correctly and at the time the PM is sent his Manuls possess at least one Amulet associated with the first letter of the Sacred Word and at least one Amulet associated with its last letter, the Demon should announce that Farmer’s name in a blog post headed “Successful Exorcism”, and that Farmer may achieve victory. Otherwise the Demon should send a reply specifying that the Exorcism Attempt has failed.

Add a subrule to this rule named “Secret Disclosure” with the text

As a daily action, a Farmer may choose an Amulet possessed by his Manuls and send a private message to the Demon with the topic “Secret Disclosure” containing the id of that Amulet. The Demon should then send a reply specifying the Sacred Letter that Amulet is associated with.

Murphy becomes inactive. Quorum drops to 4.

Add a new rule “Exorcism” with the text

As a weekly action, a Farmer may perform an Exorcism Attempt by sending a PM to the Demon with the topic “Exorcism Attempt” specifying a four-letter English word which he believes is the Sacred Word. If the Farmer guesses the Sacred Word correctly and at the time the PM is sent his Manuls possess at least one Amulet associated with the first letter of the Sacred Word and at least one Amulet associated with its last letter, the Demon should announce that Farmer’s name in a blog post headed “Successful Exorcism”, and that Farmer may achieve victory.

Add a new rule “Secret Disclosure” with the text

As a daily action, a Farmer may send a private message to the Demon with the topic “Secret Disclosure” containing the id of an Amulet possessed by one of that Farmer’s Manuls. The Demon should then send a reply specifying the Sacred Letter the Amulet is associated with. A Sacred Letter is one letter from the Sacred Word. Each Amulet is associated with one Sacred Letter, and this association does not change with time.