I want to join

The game that’s going on.

And I apologise if I voted for stuff before being registered

Add a new role to the ruleset, called Switch Supremacy:

No Gambler my post an ascension address.

There exists a trial game of BlogNomic, which is found at wp.blognomic.com. This rule of the BlogNomic ruleset has precise over any rule in the trial game’s ruleset; in all other instances the trial game’s own ruleset has priority over the trial game’s gamestate.

Proposals made at BlogNomic.com may affect the trial game as if the trial game were part of the gamestate governed by this ruleset. In no other way is the trial game considered to be gamestate for the proposes of this ruleset, other than those outlined in this rule.

BlogNomic may be in a state of Switch. BlogNomic is currently not in a state of Switch. If a gambler has successfully achieved victory in this game and a Designer has successfully achieved victory in the trial game then BlogNomic has entered a state of Switch, and any admin may undertake the following atomic action:

• Take all instances of BlogNomic out of hiatus.

• Use a text comparison tool to elicit the differences between the non-dynastic sections of each of the main and trial rulesets.

• Make a proposal on the main blog at BlogNomic.com for each difference, proposing that this ruleset adopt the version in the trial ruleset, omitting any difference that amounts to a change in dynasty-specific terminology

Create a new Segment, not on the Wheel, with a name of “Majority” and a Payout of “Gain points equal to quorum, if a quorum of Gamblers have Majority in their Wager”.

To the rule “Winner Medallions”, add:-

A Gambler may pay 30 Points to gain 1 Winner Medallion.

Add the following rule:

A Gambler may successfully Declare Victory if they have 3 or more Winner’s Medallions.

Enact a new rule, “No More Bets”:-

BlogNomic is on Hiatus.

Make the Individual named Publius Scribonius Scholasticus an admin.

Add a bullet to the list in “Wagers”, at the end:-

* Prime a random Spare Segment

In “Plaques”, replace “A Gambler whose Points are greater than the sum of all other Gamblers’ Points, and also greater than the number of Segments on the Wheel, is a High Roller.” with:-

A Gambler is a High Roller if they have more Points than every other Gambler, and more than fifty Points.

Reword the rule “High-Stakes Table” to:-

If a Gambler has at least one Plaque, has a single Segment in their Wager, and is Locked In, they may visit the High-Stakes Table. This is tracked by appending an exclamation mark immediately after their Wager.

A Gambler who is visiting the High-Stakes table may cease doing so at any time by removing the exclamation mark from after their Wager.

Add two new bullet points after the third in “Wagers”:-

* If any Gamblers are visiting the High-Stakes Table, select a random Segment that is not on the Wheel to be the Orphelin; then, if any Gambler has the Orphelin in their Wager, give each such Gambler 1 Winner Medallion (excluding those who have no Plaques), and apply the Global Effect of the Orphelin. Then remove 1 Plaque from each Gambler who has at least one Plaque and is visiting the High-Stakes Table.

I enacted the previous proposal before realising that creating two segments called “Figure” directly contradicts the existing rule that “no two Segments may have the same Name”. Nobody caught this during voting.

How should we handle this? Does “If the Admin enacting a Proposal reaches a step which cannot be applied immediately” kick in, given that it was a step that told me to create six Segments, two of which were illegal at that time? If so, what does the High-Stakes table (“a second, 6-Segment Wheel”) default to containing?