As per “Gamestate tracking”, we have:

Any single official post cannot be of two different types of Official Post unless a rule explicitly states otherwise.

“Type” isn’t defined anywhere, so I believe it must take the usual english meaning, which (by https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/type) is: “a particular kind, class, or group”

A “Voteable Matter” is a “a particular kind, class, or group” of Official Post.

A “Proposal” is a “a particular kind, class, or group” of Official Post.

Official Post of the Proposal type also need to be of the Voteable Matter type. However, Official Posts can only be of one type, and the Ruleset doesn’t explicitly mention that “a Proposal can have two different type of Official Posts”.

Therefore, Proposals can’t be made, because they need to be Voteable Matters if created, yet it’s not allowed for them to have two types. CFJs can’t be made either. This isn’t even a CFJ, actually, according to that paradigm.

Once “enacted” (after informally restarting the game), this “CFJ” (if it were), will amend “Any single official post cannot be of two different types of official post unless a rule explicitly states otherwise.” to:

Any single official post cannot be of two different types of official post (except “Voteable Matter”) unless a rule explicitly states otherwise

Replace “If the completed Missions “Secret Treasure” value is “Eldritch Horror”, they gain no Reward and the Ancient One’s Satisfaction increases by 10.” with:-

If the completed Mission’s “Secret Treasure” value is “Eldritch Horror”, the Expedition Leader selects one of its Participants in a secretly random manner, and that Participant gains an Artefact.

At-will, Explorers can remove one of their Dog Sleds (if they have at least 1) to gain 5 Supplies.

If there is no rule called “Artefacts”, this proposal has no effect. Otherwise, add to “Artefacts”:

Bunk Inspection
An Explorer who is not Untrustworthy (the inspector) may inspect another Explorer’s (the inspectee, who must be in the same location as the inspector) bunk by making a Story Post (the Inspection) indicating so. The Expedition Leader may resolve any Inspections in the order they were posted by posting the results of the Inspection as a comment on the Inspection: If the inspectee is carrying no Artefacts, the inspector becomes Untrustworthy. If instead the inspectee is carrying more than zero Artefacts, those Artefacts are destroyed by the inspector and the inspectee becomes Untrustworthy.

If “Handy Land” did not pass, this proposal has no effect.

Repeal the rule “Ascendance”.

Enact a new rule, “Artefacts”:-

Each Explorer carries zero or more Artefacts, and this is tracked privately by the Expedition Leader. Whenever an Explorer gains an Artefact, the Expedition Leader should privately inform them of this.

An Explorer may give an Artefact they are carrying to another Explorer in the same Location by privately informing the Expedition Leader of this. An Explorer who is not a Cultist may destroy an Artefact they are carrying by privately informing the Expedition Leader of this; upon doing so, the Explorer stops carrying it.

If a Cultist has a number of Artefacts equal to a quorum of Cultists, and is at the Mountain Camp, and is not at Gunpoint, then that Cultist has achieved victory.

If three Artefacts have been destroyed, then the Explorer to have destroyed the most Artefacts (breaking ties in favour of the Explorer to have destroyed an Artefact most recently) has achieved victory.

Give each Cultist one Artefact (but the Expedition Leader need not inform them of this gain).

Current members of the expedition:

2 Handymen
3 Adventurers
3 Scholars
1 Military
2 Spies

Even more conspiring conspirators can be content to hear that their conspiracies are resolved.

Add to the rule “Madness”:

An explorer with the background of cultist who is insane may make a public blog post declaring that they are HIDEOUSLY TRANSFORMED. The Expedition Leader may certify that this explorer is, in fact, a cultist by posting a comment containing the word “fnord”.

Add a rule named “Victory”:

If any explorer who is not HIDEOUSLY TRANSFORMED is the only explorer who is not insane, they have achieved victory.

If an explorer is HIDEOUSLY TRANSFORMED, and has had their post to that effect certified by the Expedition Leader, and all explorers are insane, that explorer has achieved victory.

Add to “Ascendance”:

The first Cultist who posts a DoA which Passes achieves Ur-Victory. Ur-Victory has no in-game function aside from being a formal token representing merit.

Return all Handyworked numbers to their original values.

Replace the entire Handyman background ability with:-

When a Handyman would spend a number of Supplies to perform an action, they may instead spend half that number of Supplies (rounding up) to perform it. (This ability may not be used more than once per action.)

If “The Silver Key” has passed, this proposal does nothing.

Upon enactment of this proposal, all Explorer’s backgrounds become “Cultist” and “Cultist”. Add the following to “Ascendance”:

All Cultists have Achieved Victory.

Repeal the rule “Ascendance”.

Enact a new rule, “Artefacts”:-

Each Explorer carries zero or more Artefacts, and this is tracked privately by the Expedition Leader. Whenever an Explorer gains an Artefact, the Expedition Leader should privately inform them of this.

An Explorer may give an Artefact they are carrying to another Explorer in the same Location by privately informing the Expedition Leader of this. An Explorer who is not a Cultist may destroy an Artefact they are carrying by privately informing the Expedition Leader of this; upon doing so, the Explorer stops carrying it.

If a Cultist has a number of Artefacts equal to a quorum of Cultists, and is at the Mountain Camp, and is not at Gunpoint, then that Cultist has achieved victory.

If three Artefacts have been destroyed, then the Explorer to have destroyed the most Artefacts (breaking ties in favour of the Explorer to have destroyed an Artefact most recently) has achieved victory.

Give each Cultist one Artefact (but the Expedition Leader need not inform them of this gain).

If the Expedition Leader does not have a valid FOR vote on this proposal, it does nothing instead.

Make a new rule “Unmasked” with the text:

After a DoV or DoA has passed the Expedition Leader makes an “Unmasked” post in a timely manner containing the following information:
The backgrounds of each Explorer along with the date and time they received those backgrounds.
If an Explorer used a secret power (such as the spy’s power), include what time and date they used it at and what information they received from using such a power.

If a rule named “Permission” exists, repeal it.

Amend the rule “Dog Teams”, by replacing:

and who have given the Navigator permission to do so.

with:

unless that member has posted a public blog post or blog comment during this Dynasty, stating that they cannot Tag Along, and haven’t published since a public blog post or blog comment stating that they can Tag Along again.

Repeal the rule “Dog Teams”.

If a rule named “Permission” exists, delete it.

Amend the rule “Dog Teams”, by replacing:

and who have given the Navigator permission to do so.

with:

unless that member has posted a public blog post during this Dynasty, stating that they cannot Tag Along, and haven’t published since a public blog post stating that they can Tag Along again.

Add a new section called “Horrors”. Within it, add:

Whenever a Stamped Mission’s Secret Reward is “Eldritch Horror”, if one or more of its Participants is a Cultist, one randomly selected Cultist of those (chosen by the Expedition Leader) is now also a Horror. The Expedition Leader shall make a public post which states which Explorer has become a Horror when this happens.

A Horror may spend 5 Supplies to Attack an Explorer which is at their same location. That Explorer gains 1 Insanity.

Horrors are not welcome in Camps, so they may never enter them, and if they are within them, they are instead placed at that Camp’s Latitude.

Gaelan idles out after eight days of inactivity. Quorum drops to 5.

Make a new rule “Permission” with the text:

Actions or rules can change their behavior depending upon whether an Explorer has permission from another Explorer.

Permission can only be given or recieved by an official “Permission” blogpost. A Permission post is valid only in the Dynasty it is posted during. A Permission post consists of a statement that gives or revokes permission from the author of that Permission post to one or more explicitly named Explorers. That means no statements like “Explorers with 1 or more X have permission ...”. Permission posts cannot conditionally give permission. A Permission post can give and revoke differently named Explorers within the same post a la “Explorer A has my permission. Explorer B does not have my permission”. A Permission post defaults to valid.

Permission has multipul scopes, i.e. if an Explorer has permission from another Explorer they only have the scope of permission given from the first Explorer and not all permission. As an example, suppose there’s a rule that allows an Explorer to take a point from Explorer they have permission from and there is also a rule that allows an Explorer to move an Explorer they have permission from. If Explorer B has permission from Explorer A to for the movement rule, Explorer B would not also be able to take a point from Explorer A because they don’t have permission for it.Make a new rule “Permission” with the text:
Actions or rules can change their behavior depending upon whether an Explorer has permission from another Explorer.

Permission can only be given or recieved by an official “Permission” blogpost. A Permission post is valid only in the Dynasty it is posted during. A Permission post consists of a statement that gives or revokes permission from the author of that Permission post to one or more explicitly named Explorers. That means no statements like “Explorers with 1 or more X have permission ...”. Permission posts cannot conditionally give permission. A Permission post can give and revoke differently named Explorers within the same post a la “Explorer A has my permission. Explorer B does not have my permission”. A Permission post defaults to valid.

Permission has multipul scopes, i.e. if an Explorer has permission from another Explorer they only have the scope of permission given from the first Explorer and not all permission. As an example, suppose there’s a rule that allows an Explorer to take a point from Explorer they have permission from and there is also a rule that allows an Explorer to move an Explorer they have permission from. If Explorer B has permission from Explorer A to for the movement rule, Explorer B would not also be able to take a point from Explorer A because they don’t have permission for it.

Another set of Conspiracies is resolved.

If “Insanity” exists as a mechanic, add to the powers of the Military listed in “Backgrounds” the following:

An Armed Military can tell tales of hardship and overcoming to other Explorers. If an Armed Military is at the same Camp as another Explorer, that Military can pay 5 supplies to Tell an Important Tale to that Explorer. Then, that Explorer’s Insanity is lowered by 1.

In “Dog Teams”, replace “If all Explorers that belong to the same Dog Team are able to move to the same Camp, any Explorer that belongs to that Dog Team may move each team member of their team that they have permission to do so from to that Camp as an Outdoors action.” with:-

When an Explorer (the “Navigator”) moves from one Location to another, they may apply the same change (at no cost) to any other members of their Dog Team who are at the Navigator’s starting Location, and who have given the Navigator permission to do so.

Move the paragraph beginning “If an Explorer has one or more Dog Sleds, they may change their camp to” to the end of the rule “Exploring”.

Amend rule “Using Supplies” by substituting “2” for the default value for the number of Dog Sleds.
Set to 2 the number of Dog Sleds of every Explorer who has less than 2 Dog Sleds.

If the proposal “Did I ever tell you the definition of Insanity?” failed, this proposal has no further effect.

To “Going Insane”, add:-

An Explorer located in a Camp which contains a Fire and at least one other Explorer may lose 1 Insanity (to a minimum of zero) as a weekly action.

To the “Cultist” background, add:-

A Cultist Explorer (even if they are Insane) may privately contact the Expedition Leader announcing that they have SEEN THE TRUTH, as a weekly action. In response, the Expedition Leader should set the Cultist Explorer’s Insanity to zero.

Upon enactment of this proposal, add to “Hints”:

If at any moment there is QUORUM amount of Cultists or more, the Expedition Leader shall make a Spanish Inquisition public blog post in a timely fashion. Such a post will convert an amount of Cultist Backgrounds to Scholar Backgrounds, determined by the Expedition Leader. The newly-converted shall have their new condition communicated to them in private in a timely fashion.

Add a new subrule “Madness” under “Explorers”

Explorers have Insanity tracked on the GNDT.  Explorers with an Insanity of greater than 10 are insane.
Insane Explorers cannot utilize their Background powers.

Add a subrule “Going Insane” under “Madness”

An Explorer gains 1 Insanity each time one of the following happens to them:
*The first time that an Explorer is in the same location as a Horror that they have not gained insanity from previously

Dear members of the Geographic Society,

Be it known that I have established a dig site at a great southern latitude. All hail science! I have completed the mission “Establishing a dig site”. The participants are “Orkboi”.

Repeal the rule “Exploration”.

Remove “+5 square miles charted” from the Reward of the “Where’s the mountains?” mission.