Friday, December 18, 2009

Proposal: ... the third one ducks under it.

Passed 18-0-1. Quorum for.—alethiophile

Adminned at 19 Dec 2009 09:41:36 UTC

If a rule exists titled “The Sultan and the Grand Vizier”, remove it. Create a rule titled “The Sultan and the Grand Vizier” that reads as follows:

The Adventurer with the current highest Power value is the Sultan. If two or more Adventurers share the highest value, the one of them with the lowest Corruption is Sultan. If two or more of them share the lowest Corruption among them, the Sultan position is vacant. The Adventurer other than the Sultan with the current highest Corruption value is the Grand Vizier. If two or more Adventurers share the highest value, the one of them with the lowest Power is Grand Vizier. If two or more of them share the lowest Power among them, the Grand Vizier position is vacant. The Djinn is explicitly ineligible for either role, and the values of his respective stats shall not be included when determining who has the highest value.

I used on lowest Power instead of highest as tiebreaker for Vizier, because the Vizier has mostly indirect power, and because it seemed less likely to result in a tie that way.

Comments

Klisz:

18-12-2009 03:31:19 UTC

for

alethiophile:

18-12-2009 04:59:10 UTC

for I’m not sure why bother, though.

Ornithopter:

18-12-2009 05:08:57 UTC

Mostly this changes it so the same person can’t be Sultan and Vizier, which they could in the previous version. The tiebreakers are just added in.

Bucky:

18-12-2009 05:37:31 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

18-12-2009 06:03:39 UTC

for

Dustin:

18-12-2009 07:06:58 UTC

for

digibomber:

18-12-2009 08:57:59 UTC

for

Nausved:

18-12-2009 09:05:19 UTC

for

redtara: they/them

18-12-2009 11:42:12 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

18-12-2009 11:57:57 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

18-12-2009 12:53:10 UTC

for

Oze:

18-12-2009 15:58:35 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

18-12-2009 16:35:24 UTC

for

NoOneImportant:

18-12-2009 16:36:22 UTC

for

Seems workable.

Qwazukee:

18-12-2009 16:37:37 UTC

imperial

NoOneImportant:

18-12-2009 16:42:19 UTC

14-0-1, note this title breaks the !votes command.

Scaramouche:

18-12-2009 18:04:35 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

18-12-2009 18:04:46 UTC

for

alethiophile:

18-12-2009 18:48:09 UTC

Just for future reference, make sure the ‘URL title’ in the post doesn’t contain weird punctuation, so as to allow BNbot to count it. Either that or ais could fix BNbot.

Ornithopter:

18-12-2009 19:38:02 UTC

Noted.

tecslicer:

18-12-2009 23:52:03 UTC

for

There:

19-12-2009 03:20:10 UTC

for