It’s like a poem lol

True :D

Does that make this now a Metadynasty?

Yeah, it’s now a Metadynasty.

(commenting here because I can’t comment on the closed proposals)
I was REALLY busy this week and hesitating a lot on the recent proposals so in the end I didn’t give my vote, but just to voice my opinion on some topics:

- Even if Axemabaro has gone idle I don’t think that justifies removing his Master status, which is why I wouldn’t have voted for your proposal Cuddlebeam. (BTW is it frequent for a dynastic leader to go idle ?)

- Although the game isn’t very active right now I find the mechanics rather interesting and I don’t want it to end too soon without us having explored the possibilities, so I wasn’t really in favour of putting win conditions yet. We just need some new rules to jazz up the game a bit.

It is thanksgiving tomorrow, some people take the whole week off to see family.
I’ll sticky this so more people might see it.

Ok thanks, explains the lower activity.

Idling the Master does NOT cause a metadynasty by itself; the Idling rule has an explicit exception for the Dynasties rule.

@Bucky: Where?

I dont see it lol (I might be missing something obvious…)

For the purposes of all Gamestate and the Ruleset, excluding Rules “Ruleset and Gamestate”, “Tesserers”, “Dynasties”, “Fair Play” and any of those Rules’ subrules, Idle Tesserers are not counted as Tesserers.

Can people just vote up a new Master? (I assume the Master is the Emperor.)

We can propose anything at all, even making a new Master.

Even retroactive changes. Like, “change the past” lol.