Monday, April 08, 2013

Proposal: A liege of their own

Reaches Quorum and passes 7-0 -Larrytheturtle

Adminned at 08 Apr 2013 22:07:15 UTC

In the rule entitled “Titles”, change

A Noble may be Lord and/or Vassal to another Noble through more than one Title.

to

A Noble may be Lord and/or Vassal to another Noble through more than one Title. If a rule references a set of Lords or a set of Vassals and a single Noble fulfils this requirement more than once, they are treated as a separate Noble for each time they fulfil this requirement (i.e. if a rule specifies that all Vassals of a Noble receive one Wealth, and another Noble is a Vassal of that Noble through three Titles, they receive three Wealth).

posted by Purplebeard at 08 Apr 2013 07:08:14 UTC Comments (7)

Comments

Tomas:

08-04-2013 09:49:43 UTC

imperial

RaichuKFM: she/her

08-04-2013 10:41:23 UTC

for

Skju:

08-04-2013 12:05:09 UTC

for Though it should be e.g. instead of i.e. unless that will be the only application of this rule.

Purplebeard:

08-04-2013 12:32:28 UTC

Should it? I thought i.e. could be used in this way to provide clarification. Using e.g. there seemed inappropriate to me somehow.

nqeron:

08-04-2013 13:37:30 UTC

for

kikar:

08-04-2013 20:16:16 UTC

for I’m not sure that this ammendment was strictly necessary, but it’s good to have it stated clearly. Also,Skju is right, you should have used e.g. (I’m guilty of this crime as well). See http://theoatmeal.com/comics/ie .

Larrytheturtle:

09-04-2013 05:05:44 UTC

for