Sunday, April 25, 2010

Call for Judgment: A Third Option

Failed 9-1. Josh

Adminned at 27 Apr 2010 02:25:34 UTC

Erase all dynastic rules, end the current dynasty, and begin the Sixth Metadynasty. If the game is in Hiatus, end the Hiatus.



25-04-2010 21:50:59 UTC

Idle AGAINST!  Why is “blow everything up” now the default answer to a controversial DoV


25-04-2010 22:02:07 UTC

“Blow everything up” is always my default answer. Preferably from orbit.

Seriously, though. Ais’s win was extremely questionable. It’s doubtful that it would have passed if it had been open for voting longer. (Hooray for irony.) Plus, he doesn’t want to be Emperor. Metadynasty seems like a reasonable choice in this situation.

redtara: they/them

25-04-2010 22:08:25 UTC

against per bucky.


25-04-2010 22:26:37 UTC

I should point out that the last Metadynasty I was around for was the First, so I didn’t know that proposing Metadynasty is the standard response to these kind of situations. This course of action just seemed sensible.

Kevan: City he/him

25-04-2010 22:26:49 UTC



25-04-2010 22:28:11 UTC

against  The DoV passed. It doesn’t matter if it shouldn’t have passed.


25-04-2010 22:44:05 UTC

Idle AGAINST; ais got the DoV to pass somehow, and it preserves the integrity of the game to let him do what he wants now. A passed DoV is pretty much always the final word, even if it is proven to be wrong later on (which has happened multiple times).

Interestingly enough, I don’t think he’s allowed to let it fall to Metadynasty now; he has to either lead the next Dynasty or pass the mantle.


25-04-2010 22:59:50 UTC

@Darth Of course it matters. This isn’t life, where sometimes things just happen a certain way and there’s nothing you can do. This is nomic, where majority vote changes the laws of the universe. If enough people think it shouldn’t have passed, we can go back in time and unpass it.

Darknight: he/him

26-04-2010 01:32:19 UTC

against Aieya,this is getting so dumb. So Ais won however disgraceful it may have been. Lets just move on


26-04-2010 09:40:10 UTC

(:NO_VOTE:) I don’t disagree with this idea.


26-04-2010 11:25:31 UTC


Josh: he/they

26-04-2010 12:03:32 UTC



26-04-2010 12:54:11 UTC

“CoV” against; there’s now a metadynastic option in the “new” dynasty. (Wasn’t thinking of this CFJ when I made it, although it fits pretty well.)


26-04-2010 13:46:53 UTC



26-04-2010 15:01:32 UTC


Josh: he/they

27-04-2010 09:25:00 UTC

CoV against to clear