Although, I must say, not only did I point out the loop hole *and* make a motion to plug the loop hole, but even if I had voted(I donno why I didnt) it still would’ve passed. <_< (Although, it would have led to an interesting debate. Because one part of the rules said that Ammistar, if e doesn’t vote, would get my vote. The other part says that Ammistar’s vote is assumed to be yes. But because people like winners, everyone would’ve sided with Hix anyways) =P.

But yeah. Nice job. It may not top Kevan’s infamous idle everyone else but me and then declare victory—but this is still an excellent example of winning via apathy. =)

I never would have gotten away with this.

Even though it seems that everyone wants a new dynasty, I’ve got to vote this DoV.  This is because even though the text says “must”, it doesn’t say “in order to”, but rather “whenever”.  Now there could be some dispute about what that means, but to me at least it seems that adding to the Chant is a byproduct of making a motion rather than a requirement for it.  Now, what exactly happens when a motion is actually made by someone other than Hix is anyone’s guess, but I think we can still make motions at this point.

If you must do something which you cannot do after you do a certain action, then you cannot take that action. Hix’s victory is perfectly legit, if not rather cheep.

At least my party actually got a member. Banana Republicans FTW!

This would be true if said motion was actually adopted. However, as currently no motion is adopted due to the lack of a certain three-letter-word, I’m going to have to vote no.

I have to say no.

I’m idle but I hope this passes, just to get this dynasty over with.

Please explain Rodney. The motion was adopted because the proposer and the seconder count as yeses. So its three yeses to one noes(achoo!).

Explicit .

Presumably, Rodney’s objection is the same as the one raised in eir CfJ.  The alternative to the solution proposed there is, I suppose, to reset the majority of the (S-L-O-W) work done this dynasty; curiously, no one has suggested this course of action, nor voted on the CfJ to indicate such a preference.

Move on