Wednesday, December 08, 2021

Call for Judgment: Act Five, Take Two

Times out 2-6. Failed by Brendan.

Adminned at 10 Dec 2021 16:56:34 UTC

Set the Special Case rule “No Collaboration” to Inactive.

Isn’t a 7-0 vote enough evidence that we should just CfJ this?

posted by TyGuy6 at 08 Dec 2021 16:40:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Brendan: he/him

08-12-2021 17:06:34 UTC

for ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Josh: he/they

08-12-2021 17:33:30 UTC

against This shouldn’t be a CfJ; the CfJ mechanic doesn’t exist to enact proposals that can’t enact under the proposal framework.

We enacted a rule that says that proposals can’t pass unless they hit a certain threshold; that proposal didn’t. I don’t see any reason why we sidestep the ruleset restriction; if we don’t like the non-dynastic-supermajority rule then we should repeal that.

Kevan: he/him

08-12-2021 17:45:52 UTC

against Per Josh. Not urgent.

TyGuy6:

08-12-2021 19:33:25 UTC

Ok, yes, this one’s not especially CfJ-worthy. But I really want to be able to talk freely by tomorrow, is all.

Janet: she/her

08-12-2021 20:45:38 UTC

against

lemon: she/her

08-12-2021 22:19:13 UTC

against

Raven1207: he/they

09-12-2021 06:06:50 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

09-12-2021 10:31:52 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

09-12-2021 15:31:53 UTC

against CoV per the will of the people.