Monday, July 11, 2011

Proposal: Actions are no good, let’s move on…

Self-killed. Josh

Adminned at 13 Jul 2011 23:19:02 UTC

If the proposal “Keeping track!” failed, enact it.

In the rules “Turns” and “Tracking” and their subrules replace all instances of

action

with

Move

Do so also for the plural forms.

In contrast to action, a Move is yet undefined,

Comments

Doctor29:

11-07-2011 20:00:03 UTC

imperial

Yoda:

11-07-2011 20:40:07 UTC

against because subrules are not considered part of their parent rules, thus all of the keywords in “Turn-based actions” would need to be redefined

mideg:

11-07-2011 20:42:19 UTC

imperial

mideg:

11-07-2011 20:42:59 UTC

Yoda: But the subrules are changed, too: “In the rules “Turns” and “Tracking” and their subrules replace all instances of”

Josh: RICHARDO VON NESTOR HE/HIM

11-07-2011 20:57:25 UTC

against Main Action is fine as a keyword, we just have to use it consistently.

Ely:

11-07-2011 21:14:53 UTC

imperial Mmmh

Yoda:

11-07-2011 21:35:41 UTC

mideg: Whoops, I didn’t see that.

Anyways, it would change “A Main Action is a type of action.” into “A Main Move is a type of Move.”, which doesn’t make sense in context.

mideg:

11-07-2011 21:37:44 UTC

Yeah, that’s true.

against per Yoda.

Blacky:

11-07-2011 22:32:45 UTC

Yoda, Ok you a right. However, can we get the tracking through anyway? It is not broken. Suggest a better formulation and I will use one of my proposal slots to make an update.

Bucky:

12-07-2011 07:34:33 UTC

against due to the first clause, regardless of the rest.

Prince Anduril:

12-07-2011 15:56:03 UTC

against ditto that, and others.

Darknight: HE/HIM

13-07-2011 01:37:31 UTC

against

Blacky:

13-07-2011 17:23:03 UTC

Ok s/k against