Proposal: Activate the Queen
Times out and fails 0-8. -Bucky
Adminned at 15 May 2010 07:37:01 UTC
In Rule 1.5 (Resolution of Proposals), replace “The Blognomicker who proposed it has Voted AGAINST it.” with:-
It has an AGAINST vote from the Blognomicker who proposed it.
If any sentences in the ruleset begin “If a Blognomicker votes DEFERENTIAL on his own proposal”, then delete those sentences.
Both of the CfJs that tried to clarify this ambiguity appear to be failing. This seems like a straightforward alternative fix - if your vote on your own proposal is AGAINST, however it became that (either because you voted AGAINST, or you voted DEFERENTIAL and the Emperor voted AGAINST, or some future dynastic rule manipulated your vote after it was cast), then it’s always a self-kill.
Galdyn:
I still think that a s/k has to be an explicit vote of against.