Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Proposal: Activate the Queen

Times out and fails 0-8. -Bucky

Adminned at 15 May 2010 07:37:01 UTC

In Rule 1.5 (Resolution of Proposals), replace “The Blognomicker who proposed it has Voted AGAINST it.” with:-

It has an AGAINST vote from the Blognomicker who proposed it.

If any sentences in the ruleset begin “If a Blognomicker votes DEFERENTIAL on his own proposal”, then delete those sentences.

Both of the CfJs that tried to clarify this ambiguity appear to be failing. This seems like a straightforward alternative fix - if your vote on your own proposal is AGAINST, however it became that (either because you voted AGAINST, or you voted DEFERENTIAL and the Emperor voted AGAINST, or some future dynastic rule manipulated your vote after it was cast), then it’s always a self-kill.

Comments

Galdyn:

12-05-2010 12:30:10 UTC

against I still think that a s/k has to be an explicit vote of against.

ais523:

12-05-2010 14:01:15 UTC

against in favour of my own fix. (I take it that the queue is backed up due to Hiatus delay?)

flurie:

12-05-2010 18:00:40 UTC

against I agree here with both Galdyn and ais523.

redtara: they/them

12-05-2010 19:50:10 UTC

Per ais. against

Anonyman:

13-05-2010 16:50:53 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

14-05-2010 04:22:51 UTC

against

Qwazukee:

14-05-2010 07:14:22 UTC

against

Igthorn:

14-05-2010 09:46:02 UTC

against