Proposal: Admin Option 1
13-1, cannot be enacted w/o CoV -Darth
Adminned at 13 Dec 2009 21:14:57 UTC
In Rule 1.5 Enactment, immediately after the sentence:
Whenever an Admin marks a proposal, CfJ, or DoV as passed or failed, he must also mark his name, and report the final tally of votes (or the fact that it was self-killed or vetoed).
add:
When reporting the vote tally, he should indicate the number of FOR votes followed by the number of AGAINST votes followed by the number of unresolved DEFERENTIAL votes, if any.
The way I’ve always seen it done.
Oh, please. As long as it’s clear, it’s fine. Case-by-case judgment of the admin suffices.
Ornithopter:
Do unresolved deferential votes need to be reported at all? They’re identical to people not voting. They don’t even count as votes for the “more than half of all votes” that need to be “for” when a proposal times out.