Thursday, January 11, 2007

Call for Judgment: Adminning of Eddie the Eagle, Corrected

0-7.—Chronos

Adminned at 15 Jan 2007 06:00:53 UTC

I voted against (and therefore killed) my proposal “Eddie the Eagle” before posting “Foot Faults” (which seems to be going down in flames) and “Eddie the Eagle, Corrected”.  Thus, by my counting, at the time that I posted “Corrected”, I had one pending proposal, not two, from which it follows that “Corrected” was improperly adminned to death.  I request that the adminning of “Corrected” be reversed.  (I make no such request with respect to “Sympathy for the Devil” which appears to have been properly adminned.

Comments

ChinDoGu:

11-01-2007 03:29:26 UTC

against Sorry, when you proposed your new proposal, the failing one had not been admined, and thus bhy the rules is still in the pending state.  It does not matter what order in which they were admined, it matters what the gamestate was at time that you proposed it.

Clucky: he/him

11-01-2007 03:46:12 UTC

Yeah. Even though you had voted against it, it still counts as a pending proposal until one of us can get around to admining it.  against

spikebrennan:

11-01-2007 03:47:18 UTC

OK, I was confused by the use of the word “self-killed” in 1.5.  CfJ withdrawn. against  I might repost Eddie the Eagle once the dust clears.

ChinDoGu:

11-01-2007 03:50:10 UTC

You actually cant withdraw a CFJ either.

Sorry.

spikebrennan:

11-01-2007 03:59:18 UTC

Oh.  er… I see… somebody ought to do something about that, someday.

Clucky: he/him

11-01-2007 04:04:53 UTC

Why? A pending CfJ really does no harm at all.

Bucky:

11-01-2007 18:43:14 UTC

against

spikebrennan:

11-01-2007 19:28:44 UTC

Not much harm, but if hypothetically there are a lot of orphaned but technically pending CfJs in the queue, this might distract attention from genuine ones.  What’s the objection to a little housecleaning?

Hix:

11-01-2007 22:06:07 UTC

against

ChinDoGu:

11-01-2007 22:20:50 UTC

CFJ’s can be anonymous for starters.  That would make for all kinds of intricacies.

spikebrennan:

12-01-2007 02:10:27 UTC

I see… well, you’ve convinced me then, Chin.  I hereby withd… I mean, I hereby do nothing in particular.

ChronosPhaenon:

12-01-2007 13:10:39 UTC

against

Elias IX:

14-01-2007 21:19:18 UTC

against

JoshuaGross:

14-01-2007 21:57:55 UTC

against