This feels more like Cuddlebeam wanting to be able to say “I promise I won’t Inform on you, and Josh will later confirm that I didn’t” and/or “if I later find out that you Informed on me, I will never ally with you in a future dynasty”.

I’d prefer to explore gameplay space where that kind of promise or threat can’t work.

The cross-dynastic advantage is okay by me: everyone has all kinds of personal cross-dynastic advantages based on the past conversations and experiences they’ve had with other players.

per kevan. also didn’t we have a conversation in josh’s last dynasty about how u can just ask him to do or not do certain things, ‘cause hes a person & not a rules gadget? this feels like stuff we don’t need the rules to regulate, is what im saying

[Lemonfanta] A proposal seems an obvious route to resolve a situation where several different players “just ask” Josh to do mutually incompatible things, forcing him to pick one over the others.

If this proposal fails, we should try a clear memory hole counterpoint proposing that Josh shares none of the data once the dynasty is over.