Self-killed. —Brendan
Adminned at 03 Dec 2010 15:28:00 UTC
If the Proposal titled “Age of Consus” failed, this Proposal does nothing.
Add the following at the end of the rule “Mortals”:
If a mortal has a Spouse, then that mortal must also be his Spouse’s Spouse.
Sure, the Romans might have been lax on monogamy, but for the sake of simplicity I think we’re better off this way. =P
I’m not sure “must” works, here - what if we end up with A having B has their spouse, B having C, and C having A? We need an explicit mechanic to resolve conflicts, something like “If a Mortal’s Spouse does not have that Mortal as their own Spouse, both Mortals become Spouseless.”
Although really I’d be happy to leave all these restrictions blank, and just be careful about how we create Spouses, which we don’t have a rule for yet.
What about this:
“If Mortal A can only have it’s Spouse set to Mortal B if B does not have a Spouse. Once Mortal A’s Spouse is set to Mortal B, Mortal B’s Spouse is set to Mortal A.”
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Darknight: he/him