Sunday, October 02, 2005

Proposal: Alliances

6-1, reached quorurm.  Enacted by Excalabur.

Adminned at 03 Oct 2005 23:26:22 UTC

Add an Alliances rule:

Occasionally, a country may make a post entitled “Forming an alliance: (Name of alliance)”. In the body of the post, e shall name all countries e is willing to accept into the alliance. E may not include the hegemonist in this list. Each of those countries may respond by this post by stating that e wishes to join the alliance. If, after 48 hours after the post, at least two countries beside the country who made the post wish to join the alliance the alliance is officially formed, with the original poster and the countries who responded affirmatively as its members.

Occasionally, a country may make a post entitled “Request to join (Name of existing alliance)”. In the body of the post, e may state the reason(s) why e should be accepted into the alliance. Each member of the alliance may then vote on this request the same way e would vote on proposals. If, before 48 hours after the post, at least half of the members have voted FOR, the country making the request is added to the alliance.

If a country would be a member of two or more alliances at the same time, e is instead no longer member of each alliance e was a member of except for the last alliance he joined. At any time, a member of an alliance may leave it by making a post to that effect.


Add to the last paragraph of subrule Order Processing:

If the target country and the issuing country are in the same alliance, the issuing country shall not be fined.

Comments

Rodney:

02-10-2005 19:02:09 UTC

imperial

Excalabur:

02-10-2005 19:31:00 UTC

against Alliances of two people?

Purplebeard:

02-10-2005 19:54:31 UTC

I suppose it’s possible. I expect such alliances will either be the norm or, more likely, will quickly be bullied into joining larger alliances.

This would either result in a two-alliance system or multiple pairs of countries battling for dominance, and both could certainly prove fun.

jamuraa:

02-10-2005 23:11:48 UTC

imperial

ChronosPhaenon:

03-10-2005 00:44:07 UTC

for I saw it coming. I like it. I’m not pleased I wasn’t able to come by with such proposal myself.

Excalabur:

03-10-2005 01:14:53 UTC

no, this allows only /three/ party alliances…

Purplebeard:

03-10-2005 09:39:35 UTC

Heh, I’m sorry about that. A sudden case of amnesia, I guess. The issue could be amended, but I don’t think it’s important enough to warrant stopping this proposal.

smith:

03-10-2005 15:46:13 UTC

imperial

gazebo_dude:

03-10-2005 16:51:13 UTC

for