(Post moved to the proposal category under “less than six hours old and appears to the City to have been intended as a Proposal”.)

On any roll a result of a one will be unlikely given this could go negative which may be the intent.

I think we can tweak this later

[Juniper] No need to vote on your own proposals, the ruleset assumes it’s a safe bet that that everyone is in favour of their own ideas (”if the author of a Votable Matter has not used a valid voting icon in a comment to the post, then the author’s Vote is FOR”).

I think this needs to be buttoned up a lot.

a) Per “If a set of valid values is not specified in their definition, game variables defined to hold numeric values can hold only non-negative integers. Any action that would set those values below zero is an illegal action unless explicitly otherwise stated in the Ruleset.”

I’m not sure if “Every Thief has a Level of Notoriety, which defaults to -5” is enough to make “Notoriety can be non-negative”. -5 has probably been specified as a valid value, but has -4?

b) then they must roll DICE(50-NOTORIETY) every time they Sell a Possession

Its not actually clear that “NOTORIETY” is their NOTORIETY, it could be someone elses. Or an undefined number, and thus 0

c) The timing around when the DICE roll is made is a bit unclear.

My take on (a) would be that we can infer it’s meant to keep count of “Levels” so is numeric, but that the stated default is invalid so would be ignored (the same way we’d ignore “defaults to ‘a suffusion of yellow’” for a number) and it would start at zero instead.

Seems patchable unless there are competing strong interpretations for what the value should start at, and/or anybody wants to try Selling stuff straight away.

one more until quorum

Technically, it already is because my DEF vote is treated the same as the Emperor’s, and since Kevan voted FOR, my vote is also treated as FOR, making it effectively 6-2.