Monday, May 18, 2009

Proposal: Antisocial behavior must be eliminated

Timed out at 4 FOR and 7 AGAINST, with a lot of DEFs. -SingularByte

Adminned at 20 May 2009 01:26:10 UTC

Add the following text to the end of the rule entitled “Social Structure”:

A Contestant cannot Support himself.

If any Contestants support themselves, change their Support and Vote to their default values.

Comments

Klisz:

18-05-2009 02:01:25 UTC

against You can’t force an antisocial person to socialize.

Ever.

Yoda:

18-05-2009 03:33:43 UTC

against Plus, I like the other proposal better.

Qwazukee:

18-05-2009 03:34:18 UTC

imperial

Darknight: he/him

18-05-2009 03:40:22 UTC

imperial

TAE:

18-05-2009 03:43:36 UTC

imperial

arthexis: he/him

18-05-2009 04:02:09 UTC

against

Psychotipath:

18-05-2009 09:06:58 UTC

for

Psychotipath:

18-05-2009 09:18:48 UTC

CoV Because the other one is better. against

SingularByte: he/him

18-05-2009 09:54:39 UTC

imperial

Devenger:

18-05-2009 10:24:52 UTC

imperial indifference

Kevan: he/him

18-05-2009 10:39:56 UTC

for Because it’s a bit too easy to get the one extra vote you might need.

delta:

18-05-2009 12:20:54 UTC

imperial

tuxhedoh:

18-05-2009 12:32:02 UTC

against

redtara: they/them

18-05-2009 13:23:43 UTC

against

Quazie:

18-05-2009 14:07:37 UTC

against

smith:

18-05-2009 14:19:09 UTC

for I think this is actually enforced by the current ruleset: “The Support statistic represents the other Contestant whom that Contestant would most likely go to for advice”

Qwazukee:

18-05-2009 20:24:58 UTC

CoV against

I still say that rule is unenforcable.

Influenza:

18-05-2009 22:02:17 UTC

for

smith:

19-05-2009 17:12:53 UTC

Qwazukee, you’re right - I think it is arguable.

Bucky:

19-05-2009 18:29:04 UTC

It was intended to be enforceable; I just stuck the word ‘other’ in the wrong place in the draft proposal.

redtara: they/them

20-05-2009 02:05:21 UTC

Resting on ais’s vote again