Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Proposal: Anyone want to actually plug the hole?

Times out and passes 5-0, with 5 unresolved DEFs. Josh

Adminned at 26 Jun 2010 05:03:07 UTC

Create a dynastic rule entitled “Expanding the tables.” with the text:

If the RNG makes a proposal with [New Weapon], [New Armor], [New Potion], or [New Monster] in the title, then that proposal is considered an Expansion Proposal.

An Expansion Proposal does not count against the RNG’s daily limit of two pending proposals, or their limit of three proposals per day, as described in rule 1.3, “Proposals”. An Expansion Proposal is not a valid proposal if it would, upon being enacted, change any gamestate other than that which is explicitly allowed in this rule. No Expansion Proposal may change more than one rule, or have more than one of [New Weapon], [New Armor], [New Potion], or [New Monster] in the title.

An Expansion Proposal with [New Weapon] in the title may specify one, and only one, weapon to be added to the table in rule 2.5.2.
An Expansion Proposal with [New Armor] in the title may specify one, and only one, armor to be added to the table in rule 2.5.3.
An Expansion Proposal with [New Potion] in the title may specify one, and only one, potion to be added to the table in rule 2.5.4.
An Expansion Proposal with [New Monster] in the title may specify one, and only one, monster to be added to the table in rule 2.4.

Throuought the ruleset, anywhere the sentence “The RNG may add X to this table as they see fit.” where X is either “weapons”, “armors”, “potions”, or “monsters”, appears, remove that sentence.

Fixing the original issue that led to the scam/not-a-scam and/or dictatorship/not-a-dictatorship.

Comments

Darknight: he/him

23-06-2010 21:11:24 UTC

for

Kyre:

23-06-2010 21:31:45 UTC

Would these expansion proposals still be voted on / enacted in the same manner that normal proposals are? It doesn’t quite say outright if it does or doesn’t.

I’m not too keen on the “may specify one, and only one” clauses. What if the RNG wants to add a dozen weapons to the game? That would fill up the front page very easily and might get counted as spamming.

lilomar:

23-06-2010 22:33:23 UTC

An Expansion proposal is a proposal for all purposes except for the explicit restrictions and privileges given to it in the rule.

If the RNG wants to add a dozen weapons/armors/potions/monsters/whatever all at once, then the proper thing to do would be to make a regular proposal, IMO.

redtara: they/them

24-06-2010 00:51:33 UTC

imperial

Galdyn:

24-06-2010 02:14:26 UTC

for

Bucky:

24-06-2010 06:25:02 UTC

I’m not sure this is necessary but I’ll go with it if it’s what the nomic wants.  imperial .

scshunt:

24-06-2010 08:37:45 UTC

imperial

ais523:

24-06-2010 21:35:09 UTC

for This is a perfectly adequate fix.

Galdyn:

25-06-2010 04:28:51 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

25-06-2010 16:49:30 UTC

imperial

dbdougla:

25-06-2010 21:46:06 UTC

imperial