Proposal: [Appendix] GNDT Actions alt.
Self-killed. Failed by pokes.
Adminned at 05 Jul 2017 22:28:17 UTC
Amend “For gamestate which is tracked in a specific place (such as the GNDT or a wiki page), any alteration of that gamestate as a result of an Explorer’s action is (and can only be) applied by editing that data in that place.” to
For gamestate which is tracked in a specific place (such as the GNDT or a wiki page), any alteration of that gamestate as a result of an Explorer’s action is (and can only be) applied by editing that data in that place. The Explorer should attach a GNDT-comment to it which states the action(s) used. If they do not, any other Explorer may sent a Private Message asking for the action(s) performed. If no response is received within five days, a Call For Judgement may be raised.
Just a variation on Cuddlebeam’s proposal.
Madrid:
I understand the intent, but due to the wording, there’s actually nothing new added.
“may” is, per the glossary “is permitted to”.
“If they do not, any other Explorer may sent a Private Message asking for the action(s) performed.” <- I am permitted to always send Private Messages anyway, I assume.
“If no response is received within five days, a Call For Judgement may be raised. <- People can always raise CFJs anyways.
So your addition, “If they do not, any other Explorer may sent a Private Message asking for the action(s) performed. If no response is received within five days, a Call For Judgement may be raised.”, unfortunately actually does absolutely nothing.
Imperatives are janky though. They’ve been a problem for a while and they’re hard to use.