Proposal: [Appendix] Unambiguous rejection
In the definition of “Reject” in the Appendix rule “Keywords”, subrule “Other”, change
declare that all attempted game actions taken after that attempt were attempted as though that attempt had been unsuccessful
to
declare that all attempted game actions taken after that attempt were attempted as though the rejected attempt had been unsuccessful
In the definition of “Uphold” in the Appendix rule “Keywords”, subrule “Other”, change
declare that all attempted game actions taken after that attempt were attempted as though that attempt had been successful
to
declare that all attempted game actions taken after that attempt were attempted as though the upheld attempt had been successful
Last dynasty, we noticed that the definition of “reject” is a little ambiguous – it could be interpreted as either processing actions as though the rejected attempt were unsuccessful, or processing actions as though the processed action were unsuccessful. Obviously, the former meaning is the intended one, but it’s probably best to clarify that by tweaking the language. The same thing applies to the definition of “uphold”, so disambiguate that too..
JonathanDark: he/him