Sunday, March 15, 2020

Proposal: Are You Holding Out On Me

Reached quorum 7 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Mar 2020 13:14:25 UTC

At the end of the rule “Ribbons”  add

When a nobleman goes idle, they cease to hold any Ribbons they were holding

Remove all Ribbons from all idle Noblemen

Under the current rules, say Cuddlebeam is holding a ribbon and then goes idle. As they they are no longer a Nobleman for purposes of dynastic rules, any other eligible nobleman can claim the ribbon. The ribbon however, is not removed from Cuddlebeam because “after removing it from any Nobleman who already holds it” doesn’t apply to them as they aren’t a Nobleman.

Now, if Cuddlebeam tries to rejoin the game “Each Ribbon may be held by no more than one Nobleman.” kicks in. I believe this would make it an illegal action for Cuddlebeam to rejoin. So lets just not let idle people hold Ribbons.

Comments

Kevan: he/him

15-03-2020 16:36:50 UTC

No, the “personal gamestate retains the last legally endowed values it had, if they are still valid” step of unidling has already got this. If any personal gamestate would be invalid when someone unidled, it’s set the default value instead.

Josh: he/him

15-03-2020 16:36:53 UTC

for

Josh: he/him

15-03-2020 16:37:16 UTC

I don’t mind the redundant specificity

Darknight: he/him

15-03-2020 16:57:01 UTC

imperial

Kevan: he/him

15-03-2020 17:24:55 UTC

for Worth staying, I suppose, as in practice someone would grab it straight away anyway.

Kevan: he/him

15-03-2020 17:25:14 UTC

(Stating, not staying.)

Brendan: he/him

15-03-2020 19:19:03 UTC

for

Jumble:

15-03-2020 19:24:27 UTC

for

TyGuy6:

16-03-2020 01:14:16 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

16-03-2020 04:22:26 UTC

for cov