Proposal: Blueprint: Armors are good!
Timed out and passed, 6-0 with 2 unresolved DEFs. Josh
Adminned at 17 Mar 2010 06:58:08 UTC
In Rule 2.2.19 titled “Armor”, replace “A Commoner, who owns an Invention with this Part, counts as two Commoners for the purpose of Rule 2.5 (Raiding).” with
A Commoner, who owns an Invention with this Part, counts as two Commoners for the purpose of Rule 2.5 (Raiding), except in the phrase “then this instead causes the Income of each Raider to decrease by 10. “.
A fix again :)
A that expensive Part should not have negative effects. (Also this change will make Armors more usefull, so more Commoners will “build” one and the next Raid will not fail again…)
A confusing way to write the rule, though.
Klisz: