Satisfaction of Rule 1.2: Laws/Protaganists.
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Comments
Excalabur:
14-12-2005 06:22:44 UTC
Enh. Close enough. One of these dynasties nomenclature will shake out.
I’ll e-mail you your GNDT information.
Welcome aboard.
Seventy-Fifth Trombone:
14-12-2005 08:07:13 UTC
What’s not-quite-right about this post? [not an omniscient narrator, obviously]
Saurik:
14-12-2005 20:10:55 UTC
Yeah, I actually noticed that way of saying it as I got into it more a little later. :(
I initially went for Rule as the set of all such points were labeled ‘Ruleset’, so it made (and really, still makes) sense that each individual item should be called a ‘Rule’, even though that conflicts (and I _did_ notice this at the time ;P) with the usage of ‘Rule’ to indicate something from section 2 of the Ruleset.
The Lone Amigo:
Welcome.