Nope, you only took out the hour time limit and replaced it with a 48 hour time limit, that’s not good enough.  Also, that’s not how you spell rogue.

Also, since this is a proposal, it can’t be acted on during Hiatus.

But, it also allows any player to solve the problem.

It’s not even clear what that means.  Here’s a simplified context: the atomic action involves me buying something by decreasing my cash and acquiring an item, like this is one step in the atomic action.  If I time it out, does that mean that anyone else is allowed to make me purchase the item by manipulating my values in the GNDT (in which case this is basically the same as saying that any atomic action is legal regardless of whether it was completed or not, or whether the steps are actually legal or not), or does it mean that anyone else can purchase the item for themselves, regardless of any other rules in the ruleset that normally forbid them from doing so?  Either way, it’s asking for trouble.

Yep. Can improved, but yeah the basic idea is there.

I believe that making the game itself better, rather than threatening players into playing the game better would be more enjoyable. Have a bit of deterrent but not too much, and have some gameplay-smootheners instead.

Like, “better seat-belts” instead of asking people to “grip onto the car’s seats harder”.

No, that would be like saying that people would be responsible for making their own rules instead of laying them out in the ruleset.  My CFJ makes the game better, by preventing people from sabotaging it - it’s not a punishment, it’s a measure against abuse.  This proposal only makes the game more exploitable.

Exploitable how? I think that a 48 hour window is plenty long enough for anyone to complete a Rogue (not Rouge lol, ty), if motivated to.

I JUST explained.  You don’t see how unilaterally giving everyone the ability to perform some action in a way that overrides other rules in the ruleset is a bad idea?  You don’t see how allowing an atomic action that is illegal as declared to be legal is a problem?  You don’t see how changing the person doing the atomic action would cause a ton of confusion and CFJs?

You’re just pretending to be an idiot so you can exploit this later.

I don’t like the idea of someone starting an Atomic Action and then something important pops up that makes it so that they can’t complete it in an hour and then someone else has done actions on their behalf to their detriment in the game. 

As per above.

Also this proposal does nothing because it’s lacking the [Core] tag.

I knew the tags would bite me in the butt