Proposal: Attendant Ascendant
enacted 4-0
-lemon
Adminned at 04 Jul 2023 04:14:24 UTC
In the rule Hunter/Seeker Algorithm, immediately after the phrase ‘including being destroyed as a result of a successful Mindjacking’, add
, but excluding the ability of the Ascendant (detailed in the rule Avatars) to make the values of a given Avatar valid
No details, but an Avatar has been hunter/seekered into illegal values and I don’t think I can currently fix it; it’s not breaking the game as while that is the case it ‘is not considered to be an Avatar by any dynastic rule other than this subrule’, but I don’t want to have to wait until Tuesday to fix it.
well, the cause for this being posted was an error, but the proposal itself isn’t a bad idea!
lemon: she/her
/illegal values/. huh?
can any of my fellow Mindjackers help me understand how that could possibly be? each of the three Hunter/Seeker launches that’ve taken place has sought to either A) change the avatar’s Home Tier to Tier 8, which doesn’t have any possible illegal Star Sign or Occupancy Tier values (except Occupancy Tier 8, which is always illegal); or B) set the Occupancy Tier to a value that’s below the named Home Tier, which is also universally legal as far as i’m aware!
so, am i being very oblivious, is the emperor misunderstanding a rule somewhere, or does the emperor have a scam-like unintuitive rules interpretation that none of the rest of us can see?