Monday, November 01, 2021

Story Post: Auction

61 Arveg Lane

Comments

Brendan: he/him

01-11-2021 17:29:11 UTC

0

Silverwing: she/her

01-11-2021 18:06:02 UTC

1

Lulu: she/her

02-11-2021 13:12:52 UTC

Too busy repairing 100 Dade Street

Josh: he/they

02-11-2021 15:36:43 UTC

2

Brendan: he/him

02-11-2021 15:57:32 UTC

3

Silverwing: she/her

02-11-2021 17:49:23 UTC

4

Brendan: he/him

02-11-2021 19:29:57 UTC

5

Josh: he/they

02-11-2021 19:32:11 UTC

8

Brendan: he/him

02-11-2021 20:05:24 UTC

9

TyGuy6:

02-11-2021 21:16:38 UTC

I remind Josh that “An Auction’s Auctioneer may not make a Valid Bid on it, although they may undertake Day or Night actions on it.” I’m not sure how we’d enforce this, but your bidding appears to be illegal.

Josh: he/they

02-11-2021 21:17:54 UTC

Ah, so it is, thank you. That’s handy!

Josh: he/they

02-11-2021 21:19:01 UTC

Too busy staging 4 Arveg Lane

Brendan: he/him

02-11-2021 21:28:30 UTC

😑

Silverwing: she/her

02-11-2021 21:40:21 UTC

Yeah… I noticed that, but I wasn’t sure what to do.

Josh: he/they

02-11-2021 21:55:18 UTC

@Silverwing Just raising it, like TyGuy did, is sufficient! Just as you would if someone inadvertantly broke a rule in any other game.

TyGuy6:

02-11-2021 23:37:51 UTC

Terribly sorry, @Josh, but staging 4 Arveg Lane would also be posting a Valid Bid, and is therefore an illegal action on this Auction. I have reverted your wiki change.

“A Valid Bid on an Auction Post is a comment on that Post which contains a single, whole number and which was submitted by a Realtor who has at least that number of Bucks.”

TyGuy6:

02-11-2021 23:42:05 UTC

And I might as well bid 10, seeing as how I’ve now submitted a Valid Bid.

Brendan: he/him

03-11-2021 00:07:23 UTC

Wow, that’s a good catch. We should probably patch that.

Brendan: he/him

03-11-2021 00:07:43 UTC

11

TyGuy6:

03-11-2021 02:26:48 UTC

Personally, I thought it was an interesting mechanic. 12.

Josh: he/they

03-11-2021 08:08:33 UTC

Sorry but I disagree - it is an illegal bid but that doesn’t mean that it’s an illegal day action, and given that it can be both there’s no reason why it shouldn’t retain its legality as the latter.

I’m reverting the reversion and posting a CfJ to clarify.

Brendan: he/him

03-11-2021 14:55:07 UTC

Anyway, 15.

TyGuy6:

03-11-2021 18:03:59 UTC

You may disagree, but your CfJ is the appropriate channel to challenge. I’ll redo my reversion until said CfJ achieves popularity, thank you.

TyGuy6:

03-11-2021 18:09:34 UTC

Moot point. Carry on.

Josh: he/they

03-11-2021 22:19:14 UTC

For the best; I’d have to re-revert, and I think a CfJ edit war would be undignified for both of us.

TyGuy6:

04-11-2021 06:09:38 UTC

16

Brendan: he/him

04-11-2021 13:47:25 UTC

17

Brendan: he/him

05-11-2021 14:04:50 UTC

Closing this out.