Friday, March 09, 2018

Proposal: Balance of power

reached quorum 6-0 enacted by card

Adminned at 11 Mar 2018 07:16:16 UTC

In the “Mutual Victory” rule, amend:

This Dynasty is considered to be The First Coregency of Diabecko and card and is headed by the Pawn named card and the Pawn named Diabecko each known generically as a King.

to

This Dynasty is considered to be The First Coregency of Diabecko and card and is headed by the Pawn named card and the Pawn named Diabecko each known generically as a King. For the purpose of the Core rules, either one of them can be considered as the King of the current dynasty.

I checked all references to the King in the core rules and this should be sufficient. The rule that says each Dynasty may be headed by a single Pawn is overruled by the first line in “Mutual Victory”, and the part that talks about the King of the next dynasty is not affected because I specified that this rule applies on references to the King of the current dynasty.
I limited this to core rules since the dynastic rules are written in a way that takes into account the existence of two kings.

Comments

ElMarko:

03-09-2018 22:05:10 UTC

I’m not sure how much you guys want to adhere to the 6h grace period, but this looks about right, I’ll probably upvote when I wake up tomorrow.

Cuddlebeam:

03-09-2018 22:07:18 UTC

for

card:

03-09-2018 22:26:18 UTC

for
@ElMarko we’ve ran into problems when making comments like “Greentick” too often to the point where it slows down the game. By all means point out an error or say something that you want to see in a proposal without voting on it but using it all the time is bad in the long run.

ElMarko:

03-09-2018 23:08:31 UTC

for Makes sense, thanks for te explanation!

Thunder:

03-09-2018 23:29:30 UTC

for

Axemabaro:

03-09-2018 23:51:41 UTC

for